Demographics details for Sulphur springs, TX vs Davenport, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur springs, TX vs Davenport, WA.

Data Sulphur springs Davenport
Population 16,408 1,778
Median Age 39.4 years 36.2 years
Median Income $54,950 $71,486
Married Families 39.0% 48.0%
Poverty Level 15% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Davenport

  • In Sulphur springs, the population is higher at 16,408, compared to 1,778 in Davenport.
  • Residents in Sulphur springs have a higher median age of 39.4 years compared to 36.2 years in Davenport.
  • Davenport has a higher median income of $71,486, compared to $54,950 in Sulphur springs.
  • In Davenport, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 39.0% in Sulphur springs.
  • Sulphur springs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Davenport.
  • The unemployment rate in Sulphur springs is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Davenport.

Demographics

Demographics Sulphur springs vs Davenport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sulphur springs Davenport
Black 14 2
White 63 83
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 17 7
Two or More Races 5 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Davenport

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sulphur springs at 14% compared to 2% in Davenport.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Davenport at 83% compared to 63% in Sulphur springs.
  • In Davenport, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Sulphur springs.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Sulphur springs at 17% compared to 7% in Davenport.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Davenport at 6%, compared to 5% in Sulphur springs.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sulphur springs and Davenport at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sulphur springs Davenport
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% 11.5%
Depression 24.8% 27.3%
Smoking 20.1% 15.5%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 18.8%
Obesity 39.5% 31.8%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Davenport

  • More residents in Sulphur springs report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.6% in Davenport.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Davenport at 27.3% versus 24.8% in Sulphur springs.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sulphur springs at 20.1% compared to 15.5% in Davenport.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Davenport at 18.8% compared to 17.5% in Sulphur springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Sulphur springs at 39.5% compared to 31.8% in Davenport.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Davenport at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Sulphur springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sulphur springs Davenport
No Schooling 0.8% (127) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 18.3% (3,003) 14.5% (258)
Less than High School 16.0% (2,628) 8.2% (145)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.7% (2,248) 16.4% (292)

Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Davenport

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur springs have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Davenport.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur springs hold a high school diploma at 18.3% compared to 14.5% in Davenport.
  • More residents in Sulphur springs have less than a high school education at 16.0% compared to 8.2% in Davenport.
  • In Davenport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.4% compared to 13.7% in Sulphur springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.