Demographics details for Sulphur springs, TX vs Concord, NH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sulphur springs, TX vs Concord, NH.
Data | Sulphur springs | Concord |
---|---|---|
Population | 16,408 | 44,503 |
Median Age | 39.4 years | 40.1 years |
Median Income | $54,950 | $77,874 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Concord
- The population in Concord is higher at 44,503, compared to 16,408 in Sulphur springs.
- The median age in Concord is higher at 40.1 years, compared to 39.4 years in Sulphur springs.
- Concord has a higher median income of $77,874, compared to $54,950 in Sulphur springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sulphur springs at 39.0% compared to 37.0% in Concord.
- Sulphur springs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Concord.
- The unemployment rate in Sulphur springs is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.2% in Concord.
Demographics
Demographics Sulphur springs vs Concord provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sulphur springs | Concord |
---|---|---|
Black | 14 | 3 |
White | 63 | 84 |
Asian | 1 | 4 |
Hispanic | 17 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Concord
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sulphur springs at 14% compared to 3% in Concord.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Concord at 84% compared to 63% in Sulphur springs.
- In Concord, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Sulphur springs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sulphur springs at 17% compared to 4% in Concord.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sulphur springs at 5% compared to 4% in Concord.
- In Concord, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sulphur springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sulphur springs | Concord |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 15.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 9.2% |
Depression | 24.8% | 23.5% |
Smoking | 20.1% | 14.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 39.5% | 31.1% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Concord
- More residents in Sulphur springs report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 15.1% in Concord.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sulphur springs at 24.8% compared to 23.5% in Concord.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sulphur springs at 20.1% compared to 14.2% in Concord.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Concord at 17.7% compared to 17.5% in Sulphur springs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sulphur springs at 39.5% compared to 31.1% in Concord.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Sulphur springs and Concord at 15.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sulphur springs | Concord |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (127) | 0.9% (386) |
High School Diploma | 18.3% (3,003) | 16.3% (7,262) |
Less than High School | 16.0% (2,628) | 9.8% (4,370) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.7% (2,248) | 28.4% (12,651) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sulphur springs vs Concord
- In Concord, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.8% in Sulphur springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sulphur springs hold a high school diploma at 18.3% compared to 16.3% in Concord.
- More residents in Sulphur springs have less than a high school education at 16.0% compared to 9.8% in Concord.
- In Concord, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.4% compared to 13.7% in Sulphur springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.