Demographics details for Sugar valley, GA vs San rafael, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sugar valley, GA vs San rafael, CA.
| Data | Sugar valley | San rafael |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,120 | 59,971 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 44.0 years |
| Median Income | $68,839 | $113,839 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Sugar valley vs San rafael
- The population in San rafael is higher at 59,971, compared to 8,120 in Sugar valley.
- The median age in San rafael is higher at 44.0 years, compared to 38.8 years in Sugar valley.
- San rafael has a higher median income of $113,839, compared to $68,839 in Sugar valley.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sugar valley at 42.0% compared to 39.0% in San rafael.
- The poverty level is identical in both Sugar valley and San rafael at 9%.
- San rafael has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Sugar valley.
Demographics
Demographics Sugar valley vs San rafael provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sugar valley | San rafael |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 86 | 49 |
| Asian | 1 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 33 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sugar valley vs San rafael
- In San rafael, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Sugar valley.
- Sugar valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 49% in San rafael.
- In San rafael, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 1% in Sugar valley.
- San rafael has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 9% in Sugar valley.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San rafael at 9%, compared to 4% in Sugar valley.
- In San rafael, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sugar valley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sugar valley | San rafael |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 9.9% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 24.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sugar valley vs San rafael
- In San rafael, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.5% compared to 0.0% in Sugar valley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in San rafael at 17.5% versus 0.0% in Sugar valley.
- San rafael has a higher smoking rate at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Sugar valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in San rafael at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in Sugar valley.
- San rafael has higher obesity rates at 24.9% compared to 0.0% in Sugar valley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sugar valley at 16.0% compared to 10.0% in San rafael.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sugar valley | San rafael |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.4% (111) | 2.9% (1,761) |
| High School Diploma | 16.9% (1,371) | 7.4% (4,459) |
| Less than High School | 22.0% (1,784) | 21.6% (12,927) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.6% (619) | 36.5% (21,907) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sugar valley vs San rafael
- In San rafael, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 1.4% in Sugar valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar valley hold a high school diploma at 16.9% compared to 7.4% in San rafael.
- More residents in Sugar valley have less than a high school education at 22.0% compared to 21.6% in San rafael.
- In San rafael, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.5% compared to 7.6% in Sugar valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.