Demographics details for Sugar valley, GA vs Centralia, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sugar valley, GA vs Centralia, WA.
Data | Sugar valley | Centralia |
---|---|---|
Population | 8,120 | 18,773 |
Median Age | 38.8 years | 38.5 years |
Median Income | $68,839 | $50,422 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 28.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Sugar valley vs Centralia
- The population in Centralia is higher at 18,773, compared to 8,120 in Sugar valley.
- Residents in Sugar valley have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 38.5 years in Centralia.
- Sugar valley has a higher median income of $68,839 compared to $50,422 in Centralia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sugar valley at 42.0% compared to 28.0% in Centralia.
- The poverty level is higher in Centralia at 14%, compared to 9% in Sugar valley.
- Centralia has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 3.5% in Sugar valley.
Demographics
Demographics Sugar valley vs Centralia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sugar valley | Centralia |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 86 | 70 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 9 | 17 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sugar valley vs Centralia
- In Centralia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Sugar valley.
- Sugar valley has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 70% in Centralia.
- Both Sugar valley and Centralia have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Centralia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 9% in Sugar valley.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Centralia at 11%, compared to 4% in Sugar valley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sugar valley and Centralia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sugar valley | Centralia |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 19.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 13.5% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 27.5% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 19.2% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 15.9% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 36.5% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sugar valley vs Centralia
- In Centralia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Sugar valley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Centralia at 27.5% versus 0.0% in Sugar valley.
- Centralia has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 0.0% in Sugar valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Centralia at 15.9% compared to 0.0% in Sugar valley.
- Centralia has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 0.0% in Sugar valley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Centralia at 19.0% compared to 16.0% in Sugar valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sugar valley | Centralia |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.4% (111) | 1.1% (214) |
High School Diploma | 16.9% (1,371) | 17.6% (3,312) |
Less than High School | 22.0% (1,784) | 19.3% (3,617) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.6% (619) | 11.6% (2,187) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sugar valley vs Centralia
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar valley have no formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.1% in Centralia.
- In Centralia, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.6% compared to 16.9% in Sugar valley.
- More residents in Sugar valley have less than a high school education at 22.0% compared to 19.3% in Centralia.
- In Centralia, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.6% compared to 7.6% in Sugar valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.