Demographics details for Sugar land, TX vs Ulysses, NE

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sugar land, TX vs Ulysses, NE.

Data Sugar land Ulysses
Population 109,414 192
Median Age 42.5 years 47.0 years
Median Income $132,247 $52,083
Married Families 52.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 6% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 2.0

Population Comparison: Sugar land vs Ulysses

  • In Sugar land, the population is higher at 109,414, compared to 192 in Ulysses.
  • The median age in Ulysses is higher at 47.0 years, compared to 42.5 years in Sugar land.
  • Sugar land has a higher median income of $132,247 compared to $52,083 in Ulysses.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sugar land at 52.0% compared to 47.0% in Ulysses.
  • Sugar land has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Ulysses.
  • The unemployment rate in Sugar land is higher at 4.0%, compared to 2.0% in Ulysses.

Demographics

Demographics Sugar land vs Ulysses provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sugar land Ulysses
Black 7 Data is updating
White 33 92
Asian 39 Data is updating
Hispanic 13 1
Two or More Races 8 6
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Sugar land vs Ulysses

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sugar land at 7% compared to 0% in Ulysses.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Ulysses at 92% compared to 33% in Sugar land.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sugar land at 39% compared to 0% in Ulysses.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Sugar land at 13% compared to 1% in Ulysses.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Sugar land at 8% compared to 6% in Ulysses.
  • In Ulysses, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sugar land.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sugar land Ulysses
Mental Health Not Good 12.5% 13.6%
Physical Health Not Good 7.4% 9.0%
Depression 16.9% 16.3%
Smoking 9.6% 15.8%
Binge Drinking 16.0% 23.1%
Obesity 25.0% 39.9%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sugar land vs Ulysses

  • In Ulysses, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.6% compared to 12.5% in Sugar land.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sugar land at 16.9% compared to 16.3% in Ulysses.
  • Ulysses has a higher smoking rate at 15.8% compared to 9.6% in Sugar land.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Ulysses at 23.1% compared to 16.0% in Sugar land.
  • Ulysses has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 25.0% in Sugar land.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ulysses at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Sugar land.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sugar land Ulysses
No Schooling 1.2% (1,314) 0.5% (1)
High School Diploma 7.3% (7,972) 20.8% (40)
Less than High School 4.3% (4,753) 14.1% (27)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.8% (46,851) 9.4% (18)

Education Levels Comparison: Sugar land vs Ulysses

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.5% in Ulysses.
  • In Ulysses, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 7.3% in Sugar land.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ulysses at 14.1%, compared to 4.3% in Sugar land.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.8% compared to 9.4% in Ulysses.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.