Demographics details for Sugar land, TX vs Taylorsville, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sugar land, TX vs Taylorsville, GA.

Data Sugar land Taylorsville
Population 109,414 258
Median Age 42.5 years 56.7 years
Median Income $132,247 $41,250
Married Families 52.0% 62.0%
Poverty Level 6% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 4.5

Population Comparison: Sugar land vs Taylorsville

  • In Sugar land, the population is higher at 109,414, compared to 258 in Taylorsville.
  • The median age in Taylorsville is higher at 56.7 years, compared to 42.5 years in Sugar land.
  • Sugar land has a higher median income of $132,247 compared to $41,250 in Taylorsville.
  • In Taylorsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 52.0% in Sugar land.
  • The poverty level is higher in Taylorsville at 10%, compared to 6% in Sugar land.
  • Taylorsville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Sugar land.

Demographics

Demographics Sugar land vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sugar land Taylorsville
Black 7 1
White 33 82
Asian 39 3
Hispanic 13 7
Two or More Races 8 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sugar land vs Taylorsville

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sugar land at 7% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Taylorsville at 82% compared to 33% in Sugar land.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sugar land at 39% compared to 3% in Taylorsville.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Sugar land at 13% compared to 7% in Taylorsville.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Sugar land at 8% compared to 7% in Taylorsville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sugar land and Taylorsville at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sugar land Taylorsville
Mental Health Not Good 12.5% 17.7%
Physical Health Not Good 7.4% 12.0%
Depression 16.9% 24.1%
Smoking 9.6% 17.8%
Binge Drinking 16.0% 17.0%
Obesity 25.0% 32.5%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 40.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sugar land vs Taylorsville

  • In Taylorsville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 12.5% in Sugar land.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Taylorsville at 24.1% versus 16.9% in Sugar land.
  • Taylorsville has a higher smoking rate at 17.8% compared to 9.6% in Sugar land.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Taylorsville at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Sugar land.
  • Taylorsville has higher obesity rates at 32.5% compared to 25.0% in Sugar land.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Taylorsville at 40.0% compared to 7.0% in Sugar land.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sugar land Taylorsville
No Schooling 1.2% (1,314) 0.8% (2)
High School Diploma 7.3% (7,972) 24.8% (64)
Less than High School 4.3% (4,753) 51.2% (132)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.8% (46,851) 22.5% (58)

Education Levels Comparison: Sugar land vs Taylorsville

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.8% in Taylorsville.
  • In Taylorsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.8% compared to 7.3% in Sugar land.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Taylorsville at 51.2%, compared to 4.3% in Sugar land.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.8% compared to 22.5% in Taylorsville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.