Demographics details for Sugar land, TX vs Rogers, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sugar land, TX vs Rogers, AR.
| Data | Sugar land | Rogers |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 109,414 | 72,999 |
| Median Age | 42.5 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $132,247 | $78,075 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Sugar land vs Rogers
- In Sugar land, the population is higher at 109,414, compared to 72,999 in Rogers.
- Residents in Sugar land have a higher median age of 42.5 years compared to 33.4 years in Rogers.
- Sugar land has a higher median income of $132,247 compared to $78,075 in Rogers.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sugar land at 52.0% compared to 40.0% in Rogers.
- The poverty level is higher in Rogers at 9%, compared to 6% in Sugar land.
- The unemployment rate in Sugar land is higher at 4.0%, compared to 2.5% in Rogers.
Demographics
Demographics Sugar land vs Rogers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sugar land | Rogers |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 1 |
| White | 33 | 46 |
| Asian | 39 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 31 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sugar land vs Rogers
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sugar land at 7% compared to 1% in Rogers.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rogers at 46% compared to 33% in Sugar land.
- The Asian population is larger in Sugar land at 39% compared to 3% in Rogers.
- Rogers has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 31%, compared to 13% in Sugar land.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rogers at 18%, compared to 8% in Sugar land.
- In Rogers, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sugar land.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sugar land | Rogers |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 16.9% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 9.6% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 15.3% |
| Obesity | 25.0% | 36.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sugar land vs Rogers
- In Rogers, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 12.5% in Sugar land.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rogers at 23.7% versus 16.9% in Sugar land.
- Rogers has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 9.6% in Sugar land.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sugar land at 16.0% compared to 15.3% in Rogers.
- Rogers has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 25.0% in Sugar land.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Sugar land and Rogers at 7.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sugar land | Rogers |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (1,314) | 0.9% (669) |
| High School Diploma | 7.3% (7,972) | 15.8% (11,561) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (4,753) | 17.8% (12,987) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.8% (46,851) | 20.0% (14,571) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sugar land vs Rogers
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.9% in Rogers.
- In Rogers, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.8% compared to 7.3% in Sugar land.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rogers at 17.8%, compared to 4.3% in Sugar land.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.8% compared to 20.0% in Rogers.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.