Demographics details for Sugar land, TX vs Oak harbor, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sugar land, TX vs Oak harbor, OH.
Data | Sugar land | Oak harbor |
---|---|---|
Population | 109,414 | 2,797 |
Median Age | 42.5 years | 37.9 years |
Median Income | $132,247 | $50,362 |
Married Families | 52.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Sugar land vs Oak harbor
- In Sugar land, the population is higher at 109,414, compared to 2,797 in Oak harbor.
- Residents in Sugar land have a higher median age of 42.5 years compared to 37.9 years in Oak harbor.
- Sugar land has a higher median income of $132,247 compared to $50,362 in Oak harbor.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sugar land at 52.0% compared to 31.0% in Oak harbor.
- The poverty level is higher in Oak harbor at 8%, compared to 6% in Sugar land.
- Oak harbor has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Sugar land.
Demographics
Demographics Sugar land vs Oak harbor provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sugar land | Oak harbor |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | Data is updating |
White | 33 | 94 |
Asian | 39 | 1 |
Hispanic | 13 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sugar land vs Oak harbor
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sugar land at 7% compared to 0% in Oak harbor.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Oak harbor at 94% compared to 33% in Sugar land.
- The Asian population is larger in Sugar land at 39% compared to 1% in Oak harbor.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sugar land at 13% compared to 4% in Oak harbor.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sugar land at 8% compared to 1% in Oak harbor.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sugar land and Oak harbor at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sugar land | Oak harbor |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 18.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 12.3% |
Depression | 16.9% | 25.1% |
Smoking | 9.6% | 21.7% |
Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 18.4% |
Obesity | 25.0% | 38.9% |
Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sugar land vs Oak harbor
- In Oak harbor, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 12.5% in Sugar land.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Oak harbor at 25.1% versus 16.9% in Sugar land.
- Oak harbor has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 9.6% in Sugar land.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Oak harbor at 18.4% compared to 16.0% in Sugar land.
- Oak harbor has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 25.0% in Sugar land.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Oak harbor at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Sugar land.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sugar land | Oak harbor |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.2% (1,314) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 7.3% (7,972) | 19.1% (534) |
Less than High School | 4.3% (4,753) | 4.6% (130) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.8% (46,851) | 13.3% (372) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sugar land vs Oak harbor
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in Oak harbor.
- In Oak harbor, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.1% compared to 7.3% in Sugar land.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Oak harbor at 4.6%, compared to 4.3% in Sugar land.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.8% compared to 13.3% in Oak harbor.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.