Demographics details for Sugar land, TX vs Northampton, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sugar land, TX vs Northampton, MA.
| Data | Sugar land | Northampton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 109,414 | 29,327 |
| Median Age | 42.5 years | 42.5 years |
| Median Income | $132,247 | $80,981 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Sugar land vs Northampton
- In Sugar land, the population is higher at 109,414, compared to 29,327 in Northampton.
- The median age is the same in both Sugar land and Northampton at 42.5 years.
- Sugar land has a higher median income of $132,247 compared to $80,981 in Northampton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sugar land at 52.0% compared to 34.0% in Northampton.
- The poverty level is higher in Northampton at 12%, compared to 6% in Sugar land.
- The unemployment rate in Sugar land is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.4% in Northampton.
Demographics
Demographics Sugar land vs Northampton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sugar land | Northampton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 2 |
| White | 33 | 81 |
| Asian | 39 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sugar land vs Northampton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sugar land at 7% compared to 2% in Northampton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Northampton at 81% compared to 33% in Sugar land.
- The Asian population is larger in Sugar land at 39% compared to 4% in Northampton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sugar land at 13% compared to 8% in Northampton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sugar land at 8% compared to 5% in Northampton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sugar land and Northampton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sugar land | Northampton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 8.9% |
| Depression | 16.9% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 9.6% | 11.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 25.0% | 25.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sugar land vs Northampton
- In Northampton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 12.5% in Sugar land.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Northampton at 24.0% versus 16.9% in Sugar land.
- Northampton has a higher smoking rate at 11.7% compared to 9.6% in Sugar land.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Northampton at 17.1% compared to 16.0% in Sugar land.
- Northampton has higher obesity rates at 25.4% compared to 25.0% in Sugar land.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Northampton at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Sugar land.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sugar land | Northampton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (1,314) | 0.9% (260) |
| High School Diploma | 7.3% (7,972) | 7.3% (2,136) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (4,753) | 8.0% (2,348) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.8% (46,851) | 43.5% (12,766) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sugar land vs Northampton
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.9% in Northampton.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 7.3%.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Northampton at 8.0%, compared to 4.3% in Sugar land.
- In Northampton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.5% compared to 42.8% in Sugar land.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.