Demographics details for Sugar land, TX vs New ipswich, NH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sugar land, TX vs New ipswich, NH.

Data Sugar land New ipswich
Population 109,414 5,374
Median Age 42.5 years 43.0 years
Median Income $132,247 $76,000
Married Families 52.0% 62.0%
Poverty Level 6% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 2.6

Population Comparison: Sugar land vs New ipswich

  • In Sugar land, the population is higher at 109,414, compared to 5,374 in New ipswich.
  • The median age in New ipswich is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 42.5 years in Sugar land.
  • Sugar land has a higher median income of $132,247 compared to $76,000 in New ipswich.
  • In New ipswich, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 52.0% in Sugar land.
  • Sugar land has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in New ipswich.
  • The unemployment rate in Sugar land is higher at 4.0%, compared to 2.6% in New ipswich.

Demographics

Demographics Sugar land vs New ipswich provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sugar land New ipswich
Black 7 Data is updating
White 33 100
Asian 39 Data is updating
Hispanic 13 Data is updating
Two or More Races 8 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sugar land vs New ipswich

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sugar land at 7% compared to 0% in New ipswich.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in New ipswich at 100% compared to 33% in Sugar land.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sugar land at 39% compared to 0% in New ipswich.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Sugar land at 13% compared to 0% in New ipswich.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Sugar land at 8% compared to 0% in New ipswich.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sugar land and New ipswich at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sugar land New ipswich
Mental Health Not Good 12.5% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 7.4% Data is updating%
Depression 16.9% Data is updating%
Smoking 9.6% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.0% Data is updating%
Obesity 25.0% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 7.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sugar land vs New ipswich

  • More residents in Sugar land report poor mental health at 12.5% compared to 0.0% in New ipswich.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Sugar land at 16.9% compared to 0.0% in New ipswich.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sugar land at 9.6% compared to 0.0% in New ipswich.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sugar land at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in New ipswich.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Sugar land at 25.0% compared to 0.0% in New ipswich.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Sugar land at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in New ipswich.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sugar land New ipswich
No Schooling 1.2% (1,314) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 7.3% (7,972) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 4.3% (4,753) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.8% (46,851) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Sugar land vs New ipswich

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.0% in New ipswich.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land hold a high school diploma at 7.3% compared to 0.0% in New ipswich.
  • More residents in Sugar land have less than a high school education at 4.3% compared to 0.0% in New ipswich.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.8% compared to 0.0% in New ipswich.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.