Demographics details for Sugar land, TX vs Manassas park, VA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sugar land, TX vs Manassas park, VA.

Data Sugar land Manassas park
Population 109,414 16,703
Median Age 42.5 years 35.8 years
Median Income $132,247 $91,673
Married Families 52.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 6% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 2.7

Population Comparison: Sugar land vs Manassas park

  • In Sugar land, the population is higher at 109,414, compared to 16,703 in Manassas park.
  • Residents in Sugar land have a higher median age of 42.5 years compared to 35.8 years in Manassas park.
  • Sugar land has a higher median income of $132,247 compared to $91,673 in Manassas park.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sugar land at 52.0% compared to 35.0% in Manassas park.
  • The poverty level is higher in Manassas park at 9%, compared to 6% in Sugar land.
  • The unemployment rate in Sugar land is higher at 4.0%, compared to 2.7% in Manassas park.

Demographics

Demographics Sugar land vs Manassas park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sugar land Manassas park
Black 7 15
White 33 16
Asian 39 11
Hispanic 13 43
Two or More Races 8 12
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Sugar land vs Manassas park

  • In Manassas park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 7% in Sugar land.
  • Sugar land has a higher percentage of White residents at 33% compared to 16% in Manassas park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sugar land at 39% compared to 11% in Manassas park.
  • Manassas park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 43%, compared to 13% in Sugar land.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Manassas park at 12%, compared to 8% in Sugar land.
  • In Manassas park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Sugar land.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sugar land Manassas park
Mental Health Not Good 12.5% 15.4%
Physical Health Not Good 7.4% 10.7%
Depression 16.9% 20.0%
Smoking 9.6% 14.6%
Binge Drinking 16.0% 16.7%
Obesity 25.0% 36.6%
Disability Percentage 7.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sugar land vs Manassas park

  • In Manassas park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 12.5% in Sugar land.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Manassas park at 20.0% versus 16.9% in Sugar land.
  • Manassas park has a higher smoking rate at 14.6% compared to 9.6% in Sugar land.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Manassas park at 16.7% compared to 16.0% in Sugar land.
  • Manassas park has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 25.0% in Sugar land.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Manassas park at 9.0% compared to 7.0% in Sugar land.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sugar land Manassas park
No Schooling 1.2% (1,314) 6.2% (1,032)
High School Diploma 7.3% (7,972) 18.3% (3,054)
Less than High School 4.3% (4,753) 25.9% (4,321)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 42.8% (46,851) 17.0% (2,847)

Education Levels Comparison: Sugar land vs Manassas park

  • In Manassas park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.2% compared to 1.2% in Sugar land.
  • In Manassas park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.3% compared to 7.3% in Sugar land.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Manassas park at 25.9%, compared to 4.3% in Sugar land.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.8% compared to 17.0% in Manassas park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.