Demographics details for Sugar land, TX vs Kirkland, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sugar land, TX vs Kirkland, WA.
| Data | Sugar land | Kirkland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 109,414 | 92,151 |
| Median Age | 42.5 years | 38.0 years |
| Median Income | $132,247 | $135,608 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Sugar land vs Kirkland
- In Sugar land, the population is higher at 109,414, compared to 92,151 in Kirkland.
- Residents in Sugar land have a higher median age of 42.5 years compared to 38.0 years in Kirkland.
- Kirkland has a higher median income of $135,608, compared to $132,247 in Sugar land.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sugar land at 52.0% compared to 45.0% in Kirkland.
- The poverty level is higher in Kirkland at 7%, compared to 6% in Sugar land.
- Kirkland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.4% compared to 4.0% in Sugar land.
Demographics
Demographics Sugar land vs Kirkland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sugar land | Kirkland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 2 |
| White | 33 | 64 |
| Asian | 39 | 17 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sugar land vs Kirkland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sugar land at 7% compared to 2% in Kirkland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kirkland at 64% compared to 33% in Sugar land.
- The Asian population is larger in Sugar land at 39% compared to 17% in Kirkland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sugar land at 13% compared to 8% in Kirkland.
- Both Sugar land and Kirkland have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 8%.
- In Kirkland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sugar land.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sugar land | Kirkland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 14.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 7.9% |
| Depression | 16.9% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 9.6% | 7.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 25.0% | 22.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sugar land vs Kirkland
- In Kirkland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.5% compared to 12.5% in Sugar land.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kirkland at 23.9% versus 16.9% in Sugar land.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sugar land at 9.6% compared to 7.8% in Kirkland.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kirkland at 18.5% compared to 16.0% in Sugar land.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sugar land at 25.0% compared to 22.7% in Kirkland.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kirkland at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Sugar land.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sugar land | Kirkland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (1,314) | 0.7% (602) |
| High School Diploma | 7.3% (7,972) | 7.2% (6,680) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (4,753) | 3.9% (3,624) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.8% (46,851) | 45.5% (41,904) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sugar land vs Kirkland
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.7% in Kirkland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land hold a high school diploma at 7.3% compared to 7.2% in Kirkland.
- More residents in Sugar land have less than a high school education at 4.3% compared to 3.9% in Kirkland.
- In Kirkland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 45.5% compared to 42.8% in Sugar land.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.