Demographics details for Sugar land, TX vs Iowa city, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sugar land, TX vs Iowa city, IA.
| Data | Sugar land | Iowa city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 109,414 | 75,233 |
| Median Age | 42.5 years | 26.0 years |
| Median Income | $132,247 | $54,879 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 2.4 |
Population Comparison: Sugar land vs Iowa city
- In Sugar land, the population is higher at 109,414, compared to 75,233 in Iowa city.
- Residents in Sugar land have a higher median age of 42.5 years compared to 26.0 years in Iowa city.
- Sugar land has a higher median income of $132,247 compared to $54,879 in Iowa city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sugar land at 52.0% compared to 29.0% in Iowa city.
- The poverty level is higher in Iowa city at 14%, compared to 6% in Sugar land.
- The unemployment rate in Sugar land is higher at 4.0%, compared to 2.4% in Iowa city.
Demographics
Demographics Sugar land vs Iowa city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sugar land | Iowa city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 8 |
| White | 33 | 72 |
| Asian | 39 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sugar land vs Iowa city
- In Iowa city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 7% in Sugar land.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Iowa city at 72% compared to 33% in Sugar land.
- The Asian population is larger in Sugar land at 39% compared to 8% in Iowa city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sugar land at 13% compared to 7% in Iowa city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sugar land at 8% compared to 5% in Iowa city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sugar land and Iowa city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sugar land | Iowa city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 16.9% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 9.6% | 15.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 20.4% |
| Obesity | 25.0% | 33.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sugar land vs Iowa city
- In Iowa city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 12.5% in Sugar land.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Iowa city at 19.6% versus 16.9% in Sugar land.
- Iowa city has a higher smoking rate at 15.0% compared to 9.6% in Sugar land.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Iowa city at 20.4% compared to 16.0% in Sugar land.
- Iowa city has higher obesity rates at 33.9% compared to 25.0% in Sugar land.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Iowa city at 8.0% compared to 7.0% in Sugar land.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sugar land | Iowa city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (1,314) | 0.2% (164) |
| High School Diploma | 7.3% (7,972) | 6.2% (4,655) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (4,753) | 2.7% (2,064) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.8% (46,851) | 30.8% (23,180) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sugar land vs Iowa city
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.2% in Iowa city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land hold a high school diploma at 7.3% compared to 6.2% in Iowa city.
- More residents in Sugar land have less than a high school education at 4.3% compared to 2.7% in Iowa city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.8% compared to 30.8% in Iowa city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.