Demographics details for Sugar land, TX vs Fountain hills, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sugar land, TX vs Fountain hills, AZ.
| Data | Sugar land | Fountain hills |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 109,414 | 23,785 |
| Median Age | 42.5 years | 60.2 years |
| Median Income | $132,247 | $100,317 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 58.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Sugar land vs Fountain hills
- In Sugar land, the population is higher at 109,414, compared to 23,785 in Fountain hills.
- The median age in Fountain hills is higher at 60.2 years, compared to 42.5 years in Sugar land.
- Sugar land has a higher median income of $132,247 compared to $100,317 in Fountain hills.
- In Fountain hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 52.0% in Sugar land.
- Sugar land has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 0% in Fountain hills.
- The unemployment rate in Sugar land is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Fountain hills.
Demographics
Demographics Sugar land vs Fountain hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sugar land | Fountain hills |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 2 |
| White | 33 | 89 |
| Asian | 39 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sugar land vs Fountain hills
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sugar land at 7% compared to 2% in Fountain hills.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fountain hills at 89% compared to 33% in Sugar land.
- The Asian population is larger in Sugar land at 39% compared to 2% in Fountain hills.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sugar land at 13% compared to 3% in Fountain hills.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sugar land at 8% compared to 4% in Fountain hills.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sugar land and Fountain hills at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sugar land | Fountain hills |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 15.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 8.0% |
| Depression | 16.9% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 9.6% | 10.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 25.0% | 26.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sugar land vs Fountain hills
- In Fountain hills, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 12.5% in Sugar land.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fountain hills at 19.7% versus 16.9% in Sugar land.
- Fountain hills has a higher smoking rate at 10.7% compared to 9.6% in Sugar land.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fountain hills at 19.8% compared to 16.0% in Sugar land.
- Fountain hills has higher obesity rates at 26.5% compared to 25.0% in Sugar land.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fountain hills at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Sugar land.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sugar land | Fountain hills |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (1,314) | 0.4% (88) |
| High School Diploma | 7.3% (7,972) | 11.7% (2,782) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (4,753) | 3.7% (876) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.8% (46,851) | 42.2% (10,044) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sugar land vs Fountain hills
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.4% in Fountain hills.
- In Fountain hills, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.7% compared to 7.3% in Sugar land.
- More residents in Sugar land have less than a high school education at 4.3% compared to 3.7% in Fountain hills.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.8% compared to 42.2% in Fountain hills.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.