Demographics details for Sugar land, TX vs Fort atkinson, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sugar land, TX vs Fort atkinson, WI.
| Data | Sugar land | Fort atkinson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 109,414 | 12,412 |
| Median Age | 42.5 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $132,247 | $72,215 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Sugar land vs Fort atkinson
- In Sugar land, the population is higher at 109,414, compared to 12,412 in Fort atkinson.
- Residents in Sugar land have a higher median age of 42.5 years compared to 42.0 years in Fort atkinson.
- Sugar land has a higher median income of $132,247 compared to $72,215 in Fort atkinson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sugar land at 52.0% compared to 41.0% in Fort atkinson.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort atkinson at 9%, compared to 6% in Sugar land.
- The unemployment rate in Sugar land is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Fort atkinson.
Demographics
Demographics Sugar land vs Fort atkinson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sugar land | Fort atkinson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | Data is updating |
| White | 33 | 89 |
| Asian | 39 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 13 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sugar land vs Fort atkinson
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sugar land at 7% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fort atkinson at 89% compared to 33% in Sugar land.
- The Asian population is larger in Sugar land at 39% compared to 0% in Fort atkinson.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sugar land at 13% compared to 8% in Fort atkinson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sugar land at 8% compared to 3% in Fort atkinson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sugar land and Fort atkinson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sugar land | Fort atkinson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 16.9% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 9.6% | 16.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 23.5% |
| Obesity | 25.0% | 34.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sugar land vs Fort atkinson
- In Fort atkinson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 12.5% in Sugar land.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort atkinson at 23.6% versus 16.9% in Sugar land.
- Fort atkinson has a higher smoking rate at 16.0% compared to 9.6% in Sugar land.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort atkinson at 23.5% compared to 16.0% in Sugar land.
- Fort atkinson has higher obesity rates at 34.0% compared to 25.0% in Sugar land.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fort atkinson at 12.0% compared to 7.0% in Sugar land.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sugar land | Fort atkinson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (1,314) | 1.3% (160) |
| High School Diploma | 7.3% (7,972) | 20.8% (2,578) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (4,753) | 12.9% (1,595) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.8% (46,851) | 19.6% (2,436) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sugar land vs Fort atkinson
- In Fort atkinson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.2% in Sugar land.
- In Fort atkinson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.8% compared to 7.3% in Sugar land.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort atkinson at 12.9%, compared to 4.3% in Sugar land.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.8% compared to 19.6% in Fort atkinson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.