Demographics details for Sugar land, TX vs Castle rock, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sugar land, TX vs Castle rock, CO.
| Data | Sugar land | Castle rock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 109,414 | 80,191 |
| Median Age | 42.5 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $132,247 | $135,985 |
| Married Families | 52.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Sugar land vs Castle rock
- In Sugar land, the population is higher at 109,414, compared to 80,191 in Castle rock.
- Residents in Sugar land have a higher median age of 42.5 years compared to 35.8 years in Castle rock.
- Castle rock has a higher median income of $135,985, compared to $132,247 in Sugar land.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sugar land at 52.0% compared to 44.0% in Castle rock.
- Sugar land has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 2% in Castle rock.
- Castle rock has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 4.0% in Sugar land.
Demographics
Demographics Sugar land vs Castle rock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sugar land | Castle rock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 1 |
| White | 33 | 81 |
| Asian | 39 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sugar land vs Castle rock
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sugar land at 7% compared to 1% in Castle rock.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Castle rock at 81% compared to 33% in Sugar land.
- The Asian population is larger in Sugar land at 39% compared to 2% in Castle rock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sugar land at 13% compared to 10% in Castle rock.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sugar land at 8% compared to 6% in Castle rock.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sugar land and Castle rock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sugar land | Castle rock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.5% | 13.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.4% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 16.9% | 19.6% |
| Smoking | 9.6% | 10.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 25.0% | 24.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sugar land vs Castle rock
- In Castle rock, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.3% compared to 12.5% in Sugar land.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Castle rock at 19.6% versus 16.9% in Sugar land.
- Castle rock has a higher smoking rate at 10.4% compared to 9.6% in Sugar land.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Castle rock at 18.9% compared to 16.0% in Sugar land.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sugar land at 25.0% compared to 24.3% in Castle rock.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sugar land at 7.0% compared to 6.0% in Castle rock.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sugar land | Castle rock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.2% (1,314) | 0.2% (142) |
| High School Diploma | 7.3% (7,972) | 6.7% (5,389) |
| Less than High School | 4.3% (4,753) | 2.8% (2,284) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 42.8% (46,851) | 31.8% (25,532) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sugar land vs Castle rock
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land have no formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.2% in Castle rock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land hold a high school diploma at 7.3% compared to 6.7% in Castle rock.
- More residents in Sugar land have less than a high school education at 4.3% compared to 2.8% in Castle rock.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar land hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.8% compared to 31.8% in Castle rock.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.