Demographics details for Sugar grove, PA vs Pueblo, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sugar grove, PA vs Pueblo, CO.
| Data | Sugar grove | Pueblo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 546 | 111,456 |
| Median Age | 42.2 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $68,056 | $52,794 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Sugar grove vs Pueblo
- The population in Pueblo is higher at 111,456, compared to 546 in Sugar grove.
- Residents in Sugar grove have a higher median age of 42.2 years compared to 37.8 years in Pueblo.
- Sugar grove has a higher median income of $68,056 compared to $52,794 in Pueblo.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sugar grove at 53.0% compared to 32.0% in Pueblo.
- The poverty level is higher in Pueblo at 16%, compared to 8% in Sugar grove.
- Pueblo has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 4.2% in Sugar grove.
Demographics
Demographics Sugar grove vs Pueblo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sugar grove | Pueblo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 79 | 31 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 50 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Sugar grove vs Pueblo
- In Pueblo, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Sugar grove.
- Sugar grove has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 31% in Pueblo.
- In Pueblo, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Sugar grove.
- Pueblo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 50%, compared to 6% in Sugar grove.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sugar grove at 14% compared to 12% in Pueblo.
- In Pueblo, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sugar grove | Pueblo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 14.0% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 22.8% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 38.8% | 38.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sugar grove vs Pueblo
- More residents in Sugar grove report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 17.9% in Pueblo.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sugar grove at 23.5% compared to 23.1% in Pueblo.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sugar grove at 22.8% compared to 19.2% in Pueblo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sugar grove at 18.2% compared to 15.9% in Pueblo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sugar grove at 38.8% compared to 38.3% in Pueblo.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pueblo at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Sugar grove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sugar grove | Pueblo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (8) | 0.9% (961) |
| High School Diploma | 28.2% (154) | 16.4% (18,285) |
| Less than High School | 6.2% (34) | 15.0% (16,717) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (71) | 14.8% (16,502) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sugar grove vs Pueblo
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar grove have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.9% in Pueblo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar grove hold a high school diploma at 28.2% compared to 16.4% in Pueblo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pueblo at 15.0%, compared to 6.2% in Sugar grove.
- In Pueblo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 13.0% in Sugar grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.