Demographics details for Sugar grove, PA vs Hazel, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sugar grove, PA vs Hazel, KY.
| Data | Sugar grove | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 546 | 398 |
| Median Age | 42.2 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $68,056 | $36,765 |
| Married Families | 53.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Sugar grove vs Hazel
- In Sugar grove, the population is higher at 546, compared to 398 in Hazel.
- Residents in Sugar grove have a higher median age of 42.2 years compared to 38.8 years in Hazel.
- Sugar grove has a higher median income of $68,056 compared to $36,765 in Hazel.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sugar grove at 53.0% compared to 38.0% in Hazel.
- The poverty level is higher in Hazel at 14%, compared to 8% in Sugar grove.
- Hazel has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.2% in Sugar grove.
Demographics
Demographics Sugar grove vs Hazel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sugar grove | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 10 |
| White | 79 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | 6 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sugar grove vs Hazel
- In Hazel, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 1% in Sugar grove.
- Sugar grove has a higher percentage of White residents at 79% compared to 76% in Hazel.
- In Hazel, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Sugar grove.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sugar grove at 6% compared to 3% in Hazel.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sugar grove at 14% compared to 6% in Hazel.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sugar grove and Hazel at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sugar grove | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.3% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 27.6% |
| Smoking | 22.8% | 19.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.2% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 38.8% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 35.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sugar grove vs Hazel
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Sugar grove and Hazel at 18.3%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hazel at 27.6% versus 23.5% in Sugar grove.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sugar grove at 22.8% compared to 19.0% in Hazel.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sugar grove at 18.2% compared to 15.0% in Hazel.
- Hazel has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 38.8% in Sugar grove.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hazel at 35.0% compared to 10.0% in Sugar grove.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sugar grove | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.5% (8) | 0.8% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 28.2% (154) | 21.9% (87) |
| Less than High School | 6.2% (34) | 21.1% (84) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.0% (71) | 9.0% (36) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sugar grove vs Hazel
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar grove have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.8% in Hazel.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar grove hold a high school diploma at 28.2% compared to 21.9% in Hazel.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hazel at 21.1%, compared to 6.2% in Sugar grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sugar grove hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Hazel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.