Demographics details for Sugar grove, NC vs Little falls, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sugar grove, NC vs Little falls, MN.

Data Sugar grove Little falls
Population 100 9,094
Median Age 38.0 years 40.8 years
Median Income $50,000 $44,455
Married Families 60.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 10% 11%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Sugar grove vs Little falls

  • The population in Little falls is higher at 9,094, compared to 100 in Sugar grove.
  • The median age in Little falls is higher at 40.8 years, compared to 38.0 years in Sugar grove.
  • Sugar grove has a higher median income of $50,000 compared to $44,455 in Little falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sugar grove at 60.0% compared to 34.0% in Little falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Little falls at 11%, compared to 10% in Sugar grove.
  • The unemployment rate in Sugar grove is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Little falls.

Demographics

Demographics Sugar grove vs Little falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sugar grove Little falls
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 100 95
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic Data is updating 1
Two or More Races Data is updating 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sugar grove vs Little falls

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Sugar grove and Little falls at 0%.
  • Sugar grove has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 95% in Little falls.
  • In Little falls, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Sugar grove.
  • Little falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Little falls at 3%, compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sugar grove and Little falls at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sugar grove Little falls
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 16.6%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 10.9%
Depression Data is updating% 25.0%
Smoking Data is updating% 22.3%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 20.6%
Obesity Data is updating% 38.5%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sugar grove vs Little falls

  • In Little falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Little falls at 25.0% versus 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Little falls has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Little falls at 20.6% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Little falls has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Little falls at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sugar grove Little falls
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.7% (63)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 25.4% (2,308)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 11.7% (1,063)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 14.3% (1,301)

Education Levels Comparison: Sugar grove vs Little falls

  • In Little falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • In Little falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.4% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Little falls at 11.7%, compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • In Little falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.3% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.