Demographics details for Sugar grove, NC vs Chandler, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sugar grove, NC vs Chandler, OK.

Data Sugar grove Chandler
Population 100 2,895
Median Age 38.0 years 40.5 years
Median Income $50,000 $48,168
Married Families 60.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 10% 13%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Sugar grove vs Chandler

  • The population in Chandler is higher at 2,895, compared to 100 in Sugar grove.
  • The median age in Chandler is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 38.0 years in Sugar grove.
  • Sugar grove has a higher median income of $50,000 compared to $48,168 in Chandler.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sugar grove at 60.0% compared to 38.0% in Chandler.
  • The poverty level is higher in Chandler at 13%, compared to 10% in Sugar grove.
  • The unemployment rate in Sugar grove is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Chandler.

Demographics

Demographics Sugar grove vs Chandler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sugar grove Chandler
Black Data is updating 9
White 100 72
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic Data is updating 1
Two or More Races Data is updating 13
American Indian Data is updating 3

Demographics Comparison: Sugar grove vs Chandler

  • In Chandler, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • Sugar grove has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 72% in Chandler.
  • In Chandler, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Sugar grove.
  • Chandler has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chandler at 13%, compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • In Chandler, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Sugar grove.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sugar grove Chandler
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 18.4%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 12.7%
Depression Data is updating% 24.6%
Smoking Data is updating% 20.3%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 14.6%
Obesity Data is updating% 41.1%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sugar grove vs Chandler

  • In Chandler, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Chandler at 24.6% versus 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Chandler has a higher smoking rate at 20.3% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Chandler at 14.6% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Chandler has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Chandler at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sugar grove Chandler
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 23.9% (691)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.8% (372)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 16.2% (469)

Education Levels Comparison: Sugar grove vs Chandler

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Sugar grove and Chandler at 0.0%.
  • In Chandler, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.9% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chandler at 12.8%, compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • In Chandler, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.