Demographics details for Sugar grove, NC vs Austin, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sugar grove, NC vs Austin, TX.

Data Sugar grove Austin
Population 100 974,447
Median Age 38.0 years 34.2 years
Median Income $50,000 $86,556
Married Families 60.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 10% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Sugar grove vs Austin

  • The population in Austin is higher at 974,447, compared to 100 in Sugar grove.
  • Residents in Sugar grove have a higher median age of 38.0 years compared to 34.2 years in Austin.
  • Austin has a higher median income of $86,556, compared to $50,000 in Sugar grove.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sugar grove at 60.0% compared to 35.0% in Austin.
  • The poverty level is higher in Austin at 15%, compared to 10% in Sugar grove.
  • The unemployment rate in Sugar grove is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Austin.

Demographics

Demographics Sugar grove vs Austin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sugar grove Austin
Black Data is updating 8
White 100 40
Asian Data is updating 8
Hispanic Data is updating 32
Two or More Races Data is updating 11
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Sugar grove vs Austin

  • In Austin, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • Sugar grove has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 40% in Austin.
  • In Austin, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 0% in Sugar grove.
  • Austin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Austin at 11%, compared to 0% in Sugar grove.
  • In Austin, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sugar grove.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sugar grove Austin
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.2%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 9.8%
Depression Data is updating% 21.1%
Smoking Data is updating% 11.2%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 19.4%
Obesity Data is updating% 28.8%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sugar grove vs Austin

  • In Austin, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Austin at 21.1% versus 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Austin has a higher smoking rate at 11.2% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Austin at 19.4% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • Austin has higher obesity rates at 28.8% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Austin at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sugar grove Austin
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.5% (14,322)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 7.8% (75,894)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 11.4% (110,985)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 39.3% (382,604)

Education Levels Comparison: Sugar grove vs Austin

  • In Austin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • In Austin, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 7.8% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Austin at 11.4%, compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.
  • In Austin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.3% compared to 0.0% in Sugar grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.