Demographics details for Suffolk, VA vs Pleasant hill, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Suffolk, VA vs Pleasant hill, CA.
Data | Suffolk | Pleasant hill |
---|---|---|
Population | 98,537 | 33,913 |
Median Age | 38.5 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $87,758 | $137,685 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 4% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Suffolk vs Pleasant hill
- In Suffolk, the population is higher at 98,537, compared to 33,913 in Pleasant hill.
- The median age in Pleasant hill is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 38.5 years in Suffolk.
- Pleasant hill has a higher median income of $137,685, compared to $87,758 in Suffolk.
- In Pleasant hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 40.0% in Suffolk.
- Suffolk has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 4% in Pleasant hill.
- Pleasant hill has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.2% in Suffolk.
Demographics
Demographics Suffolk vs Pleasant hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Suffolk | Pleasant hill |
---|---|---|
Black | 40 | 4 |
White | 47 | 54 |
Asian | 2 | 17 |
Hispanic | 5 | 14 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Suffolk vs Pleasant hill
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Suffolk at 40% compared to 4% in Pleasant hill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pleasant hill at 54% compared to 47% in Suffolk.
- In Pleasant hill, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 2% in Suffolk.
- Pleasant hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 5% in Suffolk.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pleasant hill at 11%, compared to 6% in Suffolk.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Suffolk and Pleasant hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Suffolk | Pleasant hill |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 13.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 8.1% |
Depression | 21.4% | 17.4% |
Smoking | 15.3% | 8.3% |
Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 42.4% | 22.6% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Suffolk vs Pleasant hill
- More residents in Suffolk report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 13.4% in Pleasant hill.
- Depression is more prevalent in Suffolk at 21.4% compared to 17.4% in Pleasant hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Suffolk at 15.3% compared to 8.3% in Pleasant hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pleasant hill at 17.7% compared to 16.6% in Suffolk.
- Obesity rates are higher in Suffolk at 42.4% compared to 22.6% in Pleasant hill.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Suffolk and Pleasant hill at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Suffolk | Pleasant hill |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (965) | 1.4% (469) |
High School Diploma | 14.9% (14,643) | 7.5% (2,527) |
Less than High School | 7.8% (7,701) | 5.8% (1,962) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (20,740) | 40.9% (13,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: Suffolk vs Pleasant hill
- In Pleasant hill, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 1.0% in Suffolk.
- A higher percentage of residents in Suffolk hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 7.5% in Pleasant hill.
- More residents in Suffolk have less than a high school education at 7.8% compared to 5.8% in Pleasant hill.
- In Pleasant hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.9% compared to 21.0% in Suffolk.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.