Demographics details for Suffolk, VA vs Frisco, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Suffolk, VA vs Frisco, TX.
| Data | Suffolk | Frisco |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 98,537 | 219,587 |
| Median Age | 38.5 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $87,758 | $144,567 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 7% | 3% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Suffolk vs Frisco
- The population in Frisco is higher at 219,587, compared to 98,537 in Suffolk.
- Residents in Suffolk have a higher median age of 38.5 years compared to 37.8 years in Frisco.
- Frisco has a higher median income of $144,567, compared to $87,758 in Suffolk.
- In Frisco, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 40.0% in Suffolk.
- Suffolk has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 3% in Frisco.
- Frisco has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.2% in Suffolk.
Demographics
Demographics Suffolk vs Frisco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Suffolk | Frisco |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 40 | 8 |
| White | 47 | 49 |
| Asian | 2 | 23 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Suffolk vs Frisco
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Suffolk at 40% compared to 8% in Frisco.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Frisco at 49% compared to 47% in Suffolk.
- In Frisco, the Asian population stands at 23%, greater than 2% in Suffolk.
- Frisco has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 5% in Suffolk.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Frisco at 8%, compared to 6% in Suffolk.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Suffolk and Frisco at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Suffolk | Frisco |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 13.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.6% | 7.9% |
| Depression | 21.4% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 9.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.6% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 42.4% | 27.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Suffolk vs Frisco
- More residents in Suffolk report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 13.4% in Frisco.
- Depression is more prevalent in Suffolk at 21.4% compared to 20.8% in Frisco.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Suffolk at 15.3% compared to 9.6% in Frisco.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Frisco at 18.4% compared to 16.6% in Suffolk.
- Obesity rates are higher in Suffolk at 42.4% compared to 27.4% in Frisco.
- Disability percentages are higher in Suffolk at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in Frisco.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Suffolk | Frisco |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.0% (965) | 0.6% (1,358) |
| High School Diploma | 14.9% (14,643) | 5.0% (11,084) |
| Less than High School | 7.8% (7,701) | 3.4% (7,431) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (20,740) | 38.9% (85,346) |
Education Levels Comparison: Suffolk vs Frisco
- A higher percentage of residents in Suffolk have no formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in Frisco.
- A higher percentage of residents in Suffolk hold a high school diploma at 14.9% compared to 5.0% in Frisco.
- More residents in Suffolk have less than a high school education at 7.8% compared to 3.4% in Frisco.
- In Frisco, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 21.0% in Suffolk.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.