Environment details: Suffolk VA
Average quality; ongoing monitoring required.
Environment details: Centralia WA
Average quality; urban runoff affects levels.
Compare Environment: Suffolk VA vs Centralia WA
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Suffolk | Centralia |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 784 | 590 |
| Water Quality | 4/10 | 4/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | Average quality; ongoing monitoring required. | Average quality; urban runoff affects levels. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.65 | 1.5 |
| Worst AQI | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 31 | 16 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Suffolk vs Centralia
- Both cities report the same water quality at 4/10.
- The median air quality index is lower (worse) in Suffolk at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Centralia.
- The average air quality index is worse in Suffolk with 1.65 compared to 1.5 in Centralia.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Suffolk at 31 compared to 16 in Centralia.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.