Demographics details for Stuttgart, AR vs Union city, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stuttgart, AR vs Union city, PA.
| Data | Stuttgart | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,907 | 2,887 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 46.6 years |
| Median Income | $59,124 | $41,764 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Stuttgart vs Union city
- In Stuttgart, the population is higher at 7,907, compared to 2,887 in Union city.
- The median age in Union city is higher at 46.6 years, compared to 37.8 years in Stuttgart.
- Stuttgart has a higher median income of $59,124 compared to $41,764 in Union city.
- In Union city, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 39.0% in Stuttgart.
- Stuttgart has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 12% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.2% in Stuttgart.
Demographics
Demographics Stuttgart vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stuttgart | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 42 | Data is updating |
| White | 53 | 91 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Stuttgart vs Union city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Stuttgart at 42% compared to 0% in Union city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Union city at 91% compared to 53% in Stuttgart.
- Both Stuttgart and Union city have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Union city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Stuttgart.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Union city at 5%, compared to 3% in Stuttgart.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stuttgart and Union city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stuttgart | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 14.5% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 25.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 39.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stuttgart vs Union city
- More residents in Stuttgart report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 19.6% in Union city.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Union city at 24.6% versus 24.4% in Stuttgart.
- Union city has a higher smoking rate at 25.3% compared to 23.1% in Stuttgart.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Union city at 17.8% compared to 13.6% in Stuttgart.
- Obesity rates are higher in Stuttgart at 39.7% compared to 39.2% in Union city.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union city at 21.0% compared to 20.0% in Stuttgart.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stuttgart | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (63) | 0.3% (9) |
| High School Diploma | 25.5% (2,015) | 42.5% (1,226) |
| Less than High School | 14.5% (1,144) | 16.5% (476) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.0% (948) | 8.2% (237) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stuttgart vs Union city
- A higher percentage of residents in Stuttgart have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in Union city.
- In Union city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 42.5% compared to 25.5% in Stuttgart.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Union city at 16.5%, compared to 14.5% in Stuttgart.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stuttgart hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.0% compared to 8.2% in Union city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.