Demographics details for Stuttgart, AR vs Summerfield, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stuttgart, AR vs Summerfield, OH.
| Data | Stuttgart | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,907 | 242 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 49.8 years |
| Median Income | $59,124 | $29,412 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Stuttgart vs Summerfield
- In Stuttgart, the population is higher at 7,907, compared to 242 in Summerfield.
- The median age in Summerfield is higher at 49.8 years, compared to 37.8 years in Stuttgart.
- Stuttgart has a higher median income of $59,124 compared to $29,412 in Summerfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Stuttgart at 39.0% compared to 36.0% in Summerfield.
- Stuttgart has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 13% in Summerfield.
- The unemployment rate in Stuttgart is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Summerfield.
Demographics
Demographics Stuttgart vs Summerfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stuttgart | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 42 | Data is updating |
| White | 53 | 97 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Stuttgart vs Summerfield
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Stuttgart at 42% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Summerfield at 97% compared to 53% in Stuttgart.
- Both Stuttgart and Summerfield have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Summerfield has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Stuttgart.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Stuttgart at 3% compared to 0% in Summerfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stuttgart and Summerfield at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stuttgart | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 24.2% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 39.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stuttgart vs Summerfield
- More residents in Stuttgart report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 18.1% in Summerfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Stuttgart at 24.4% compared to 24.2% in Summerfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Stuttgart at 23.1% compared to 22.3% in Summerfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Summerfield at 17.9% compared to 13.6% in Stuttgart.
- Obesity rates are higher in Stuttgart at 39.7% compared to 39.2% in Summerfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Stuttgart at 20.0% compared to 17.0% in Summerfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stuttgart | Summerfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (63) | 1.2% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 25.5% (2,015) | 31.4% (76) |
| Less than High School | 14.5% (1,144) | 17.4% (42) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.0% (948) | 2.1% (5) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stuttgart vs Summerfield
- In Summerfield, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.8% in Stuttgart.
- In Summerfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.4% compared to 25.5% in Stuttgart.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Summerfield at 17.4%, compared to 14.5% in Stuttgart.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stuttgart hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.0% compared to 2.1% in Summerfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.