Demographics details for Stuttgart, AR vs Lumberton, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Stuttgart, AR vs Lumberton, NC.

Data Stuttgart Lumberton
Population 7,907 18,841
Median Age 37.8 years 37.2 years
Median Income $59,124 $41,314
Married Families 39.0% 25.0%
Poverty Level 18% 23%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 7.1

Population Comparison: Stuttgart vs Lumberton

  • The population in Lumberton is higher at 18,841, compared to 7,907 in Stuttgart.
  • Residents in Stuttgart have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 37.2 years in Lumberton.
  • Stuttgart has a higher median income of $59,124 compared to $41,314 in Lumberton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Stuttgart at 39.0% compared to 25.0% in Lumberton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Lumberton at 23%, compared to 18% in Stuttgart.
  • Lumberton has a higher unemployment rate at 7.1% compared to 4.2% in Stuttgart.

Demographics

Demographics Stuttgart vs Lumberton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Stuttgart Lumberton
Black 42 37
White 53 36
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 2 9
Two or More Races 3 4
American Indian Data is updating 13

Demographics Comparison: Stuttgart vs Lumberton

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Stuttgart at 42% compared to 37% in Lumberton.
  • Stuttgart has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 36% in Lumberton.
  • In Lumberton, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Stuttgart.
  • Lumberton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 2% in Stuttgart.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lumberton at 4%, compared to 3% in Stuttgart.
  • In Lumberton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 13%, compared to 0% in Stuttgart.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Stuttgart Lumberton
Mental Health Not Good 19.8% 18.9%
Physical Health Not Good 14.6% 15.8%
Depression 24.4% 22.8%
Smoking 23.1% 25.2%
Binge Drinking 13.6% 13.9%
Obesity 39.7% 44.4%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Stuttgart vs Lumberton

  • More residents in Stuttgart report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 18.9% in Lumberton.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Stuttgart at 24.4% compared to 22.8% in Lumberton.
  • Lumberton has a higher smoking rate at 25.2% compared to 23.1% in Stuttgart.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Lumberton at 13.9% compared to 13.6% in Stuttgart.
  • Lumberton has higher obesity rates at 44.4% compared to 39.7% in Stuttgart.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Stuttgart at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Lumberton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Stuttgart Lumberton
No Schooling 0.8% (63) 0.9% (161)
High School Diploma 25.5% (2,015) 16.6% (3,130)
Less than High School 14.5% (1,144) 19.2% (3,624)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 12.0% (948) 14.5% (2,730)

Education Levels Comparison: Stuttgart vs Lumberton

  • In Lumberton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.8% in Stuttgart.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Stuttgart hold a high school diploma at 25.5% compared to 16.6% in Lumberton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lumberton at 19.2%, compared to 14.5% in Stuttgart.
  • In Lumberton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 12.0% in Stuttgart.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.