Demographics details for Stuttgart, AR vs Longville, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stuttgart, AR vs Longville, LA.
| Data | Stuttgart | Longville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,907 | 319 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 68.6 years |
| Median Income | $59,124 | $37,650 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Stuttgart vs Longville
- In Stuttgart, the population is higher at 7,907, compared to 319 in Longville.
- The median age in Longville is higher at 68.6 years, compared to 37.8 years in Stuttgart.
- Stuttgart has a higher median income of $59,124 compared to $37,650 in Longville.
- In Longville, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 39.0% in Stuttgart.
- Stuttgart has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 15% in Longville.
- Longville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.2% in Stuttgart.
Demographics
Demographics Stuttgart vs Longville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stuttgart | Longville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 42 | Data is updating |
| White | 53 | 90 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Stuttgart vs Longville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Stuttgart at 42% compared to 0% in Longville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Longville at 90% compared to 53% in Stuttgart.
- Both Stuttgart and Longville have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Stuttgart at 2% compared to 0% in Longville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Longville at 10%, compared to 3% in Stuttgart.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stuttgart and Longville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stuttgart | Longville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 19.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 29.8% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 20.0% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 39.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 78.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stuttgart vs Longville
- More residents in Stuttgart report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 19.5% in Longville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Longville at 29.8% versus 24.4% in Stuttgart.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Stuttgart at 23.1% compared to 22.9% in Longville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Longville at 20.0% compared to 13.6% in Stuttgart.
- Obesity rates are higher in Stuttgart at 39.7% compared to 39.0% in Longville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Longville at 78.0% compared to 20.0% in Stuttgart.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stuttgart | Longville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (63) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 25.5% (2,015) | 15.4% (49) |
| Less than High School | 14.5% (1,144) | 36.7% (117) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.0% (948) | 16.9% (54) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stuttgart vs Longville
- A higher percentage of residents in Stuttgart have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Longville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stuttgart hold a high school diploma at 25.5% compared to 15.4% in Longville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Longville at 36.7%, compared to 14.5% in Stuttgart.
- In Longville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.9% compared to 12.0% in Stuttgart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.