Demographics details for Stuttgart, AR vs Litchfield park, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stuttgart, AR vs Litchfield park, AZ.
| Data | Stuttgart | Litchfield park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,907 | 6,960 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 47.7 years |
| Median Income | $59,124 | $117,601 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Stuttgart vs Litchfield park
- In Stuttgart, the population is higher at 7,907, compared to 6,960 in Litchfield park.
- The median age in Litchfield park is higher at 47.7 years, compared to 37.8 years in Stuttgart.
- Litchfield park has a higher median income of $117,601, compared to $59,124 in Stuttgart.
- In Litchfield park, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 39.0% in Stuttgart.
- Stuttgart has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 5% in Litchfield park.
- Litchfield park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.2% in Stuttgart.
Demographics
Demographics Stuttgart vs Litchfield park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stuttgart | Litchfield park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 42 | 2 |
| White | 53 | 57 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 23 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Stuttgart vs Litchfield park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Stuttgart at 42% compared to 2% in Litchfield park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Litchfield park at 57% compared to 53% in Stuttgart.
- In Litchfield park, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Stuttgart.
- Litchfield park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 2% in Stuttgart.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Litchfield park at 12%, compared to 3% in Stuttgart.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stuttgart and Litchfield park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stuttgart | Litchfield park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 8.3% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 18.9% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 10.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 27.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stuttgart vs Litchfield park
- More residents in Stuttgart report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 15.0% in Litchfield park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Stuttgart at 24.4% compared to 18.9% in Litchfield park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Stuttgart at 23.1% compared to 10.7% in Litchfield park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Litchfield park at 18.9% compared to 13.6% in Stuttgart.
- Obesity rates are higher in Stuttgart at 39.7% compared to 27.2% in Litchfield park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Stuttgart at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Litchfield park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stuttgart | Litchfield park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (63) | 0.2% (16) |
| High School Diploma | 25.5% (2,015) | 11.2% (777) |
| Less than High School | 14.5% (1,144) | 2.2% (150) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.0% (948) | 36.0% (2,504) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stuttgart vs Litchfield park
- A higher percentage of residents in Stuttgart have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.2% in Litchfield park.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stuttgart hold a high school diploma at 25.5% compared to 11.2% in Litchfield park.
- More residents in Stuttgart have less than a high school education at 14.5% compared to 2.2% in Litchfield park.
- In Litchfield park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.0% compared to 12.0% in Stuttgart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.