Demographics details for Stuttgart, AR vs Albany, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stuttgart, AR vs Albany, GA.
| Data | Stuttgart | Albany |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,907 | 67,192 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 34.7 years |
| Median Income | $59,124 | $43,724 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 22.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 23% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Stuttgart vs Albany
- The population in Albany is higher at 67,192, compared to 7,907 in Stuttgart.
- Residents in Stuttgart have a higher median age of 37.8 years compared to 34.7 years in Albany.
- Stuttgart has a higher median income of $59,124 compared to $43,724 in Albany.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Stuttgart at 39.0% compared to 22.0% in Albany.
- The poverty level is higher in Albany at 23%, compared to 18% in Stuttgart.
- Albany has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.2% in Stuttgart.
Demographics
Demographics Stuttgart vs Albany provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stuttgart | Albany |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 42 | 78 |
| White | 53 | 15 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Stuttgart vs Albany
- In Albany, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 78% compared to 42% in Stuttgart.
- Stuttgart has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 15% in Albany.
- In Albany, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Stuttgart.
- Albany has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Stuttgart.
- Both Stuttgart and Albany have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 3%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stuttgart and Albany at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stuttgart | Albany |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 19.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 15.2% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 22.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 13.4% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stuttgart vs Albany
- More residents in Stuttgart report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 19.4% in Albany.
- Depression is more prevalent in Stuttgart at 24.4% compared to 19.9% in Albany.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Stuttgart at 23.1% compared to 22.5% in Albany.
- Binge drinking is more common in Stuttgart at 13.6% compared to 13.4% in Albany.
- Albany has higher obesity rates at 41.9% compared to 39.7% in Stuttgart.
- Disability percentages are higher in Stuttgart at 20.0% compared to 18.0% in Albany.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stuttgart | Albany |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (63) | 0.8% (548) |
| High School Diploma | 25.5% (2,015) | 16.1% (10,851) |
| Less than High School | 14.5% (1,144) | 12.9% (8,664) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.0% (948) | 14.5% (9,737) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stuttgart vs Albany
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Stuttgart and Albany at 0.8%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stuttgart hold a high school diploma at 25.5% compared to 16.1% in Albany.
- More residents in Stuttgart have less than a high school education at 14.5% compared to 12.9% in Albany.
- In Albany, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.5% compared to 12.0% in Stuttgart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.