Demographics details for Stuttgart, AR vs Addison, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stuttgart, AR vs Addison, IL.
| Data | Stuttgart | Addison |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,907 | 35,127 |
| Median Age | 37.8 years | 40.1 years |
| Median Income | $59,124 | $82,547 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Stuttgart vs Addison
- The population in Addison is higher at 35,127, compared to 7,907 in Stuttgart.
- The median age in Addison is higher at 40.1 years, compared to 37.8 years in Stuttgart.
- Addison has a higher median income of $82,547, compared to $59,124 in Stuttgart.
- In Addison, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 39.0% in Stuttgart.
- Stuttgart has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 5% in Addison.
- Addison has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 4.2% in Stuttgart.
Demographics
Demographics Stuttgart vs Addison provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stuttgart | Addison |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 42 | 4 |
| White | 53 | 32 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 9 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 42 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Stuttgart vs Addison
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Stuttgart at 42% compared to 4% in Addison.
- Stuttgart has a higher percentage of White residents at 53% compared to 32% in Addison.
- In Addison, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Stuttgart.
- Addison has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 42%, compared to 2% in Stuttgart.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Addison at 12%, compared to 3% in Stuttgart.
- In Addison, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Stuttgart.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stuttgart | Addison |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.8% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.6% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 23.1% | 14.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 15.5% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stuttgart vs Addison
- More residents in Stuttgart report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 14.2% in Addison.
- Depression is more prevalent in Stuttgart at 24.4% compared to 17.7% in Addison.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Stuttgart at 23.1% compared to 14.9% in Addison.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Addison at 15.5% compared to 13.6% in Stuttgart.
- Obesity rates are higher in Stuttgart at 39.7% compared to 35.0% in Addison.
- Disability percentages are higher in Stuttgart at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Addison.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stuttgart | Addison |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (63) | 2.1% (744) |
| High School Diploma | 25.5% (2,015) | 19.0% (6,671) |
| Less than High School | 14.5% (1,144) | 27.2% (9,554) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.0% (948) | 17.1% (6,014) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stuttgart vs Addison
- In Addison, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.8% in Stuttgart.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stuttgart hold a high school diploma at 25.5% compared to 19.0% in Addison.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Addison at 27.2%, compared to 14.5% in Stuttgart.
- In Addison, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 12.0% in Stuttgart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.