Demographics details for Sturkie, AR vs Bellingham, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sturkie, AR vs Bellingham, WA.

Data Sturkie Bellingham
Population 118 93,896
Median Age 40.0 years 33.7 years
Median Income $50,000 $64,026
Married Families 55.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 10% 11%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 4.5

Population Comparison: Sturkie vs Bellingham

  • The population in Bellingham is higher at 93,896, compared to 118 in Sturkie.
  • Residents in Sturkie have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 33.7 years in Bellingham.
  • Bellingham has a higher median income of $64,026, compared to $50,000 in Sturkie.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sturkie at 55.0% compared to 32.0% in Bellingham.
  • The poverty level is higher in Bellingham at 11%, compared to 10% in Sturkie.
  • Bellingham has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Sturkie.

Demographics

Demographics Sturkie vs Bellingham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sturkie Bellingham
Black Data is updating 1
White 100 74
Asian Data is updating 6
Hispanic Data is updating 10
Two or More Races Data is updating 8
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Sturkie vs Bellingham

  • In Bellingham, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Sturkie.
  • Sturkie has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 74% in Bellingham.
  • In Bellingham, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Sturkie.
  • Bellingham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 0% in Sturkie.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bellingham at 8%, compared to 0% in Sturkie.
  • In Bellingham, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sturkie.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sturkie Bellingham
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 17.6%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 10.9%
Depression Data is updating% 30.0%
Smoking Data is updating% 14.1%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 17.3%
Obesity Data is updating% 25.6%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sturkie vs Bellingham

  • In Bellingham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Sturkie.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Bellingham at 30.0% versus 0.0% in Sturkie.
  • Bellingham has a higher smoking rate at 14.1% compared to 0.0% in Sturkie.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Bellingham at 17.3% compared to 0.0% in Sturkie.
  • Bellingham has higher obesity rates at 25.6% compared to 0.0% in Sturkie.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bellingham at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Sturkie.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sturkie Bellingham
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.5% (454)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 8.8% (8,220)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 6.2% (5,781)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 28.9% (27,095)

Education Levels Comparison: Sturkie vs Bellingham

  • In Bellingham, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Sturkie.
  • In Bellingham, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 8.8% compared to 0.0% in Sturkie.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bellingham at 6.2%, compared to 0.0% in Sturkie.
  • In Bellingham, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.9% compared to 0.0% in Sturkie.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.