Demographics details for Sturkie, AR vs Alum creek, WV

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sturkie, AR vs Alum creek, WV.

Data Sturkie Alum creek
Population 118 1,420
Median Age 40.0 years 47.4 years
Median Income $50,000 $65,179
Married Families 55.0% 54.0%
Poverty Level 10% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 4.5

Population Comparison: Sturkie vs Alum creek

  • The population in Alum creek is higher at 1,420, compared to 118 in Sturkie.
  • The median age in Alum creek is higher at 47.4 years, compared to 40.0 years in Sturkie.
  • Alum creek has a higher median income of $65,179, compared to $50,000 in Sturkie.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Sturkie at 55.0% compared to 54.0% in Alum creek.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Sturkie and Alum creek at 10%.
  • Alum creek has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.0% in Sturkie.

Demographics

Demographics Sturkie vs Alum creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sturkie Alum creek
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 100 100
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races Data is updating Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sturkie vs Alum creek

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Sturkie and Alum creek at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is the same in both Sturkie and Alum creek at 100%.
  • Both Sturkie and Alum creek have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Sturkie and Alum creek at 0%.
  • Both Sturkie and Alum creek have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 0%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sturkie and Alum creek at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sturkie Alum creek
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 20.2%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 13.5%
Depression Data is updating% 29.5%
Smoking Data is updating% 20.6%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 15.1%
Obesity Data is updating% 40.1%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 30.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sturkie vs Alum creek

  • In Alum creek, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 0.0% in Sturkie.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Alum creek at 29.5% versus 0.0% in Sturkie.
  • Alum creek has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 0.0% in Sturkie.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Alum creek at 15.1% compared to 0.0% in Sturkie.
  • Alum creek has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 0.0% in Sturkie.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Alum creek at 30.0% compared to 0.0% in Sturkie.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sturkie Alum creek
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 34.9% (496)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 8.9% (126)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 9.7% (138)

Education Levels Comparison: Sturkie vs Alum creek

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Sturkie and Alum creek at 0.0%.
  • In Alum creek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 34.9% compared to 0.0% in Sturkie.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Alum creek at 8.9%, compared to 0.0% in Sturkie.
  • In Alum creek, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.7% compared to 0.0% in Sturkie.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.