Demographics details for Strum, WI vs Lexington, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Strum, WI vs Lexington, KY.
Data | Strum | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,068 | 320,347 |
Median Age | 33.7 years | 35.2 years |
Median Income | $64,911 | $66,087 |
Married Families | 41.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Strum vs Lexington
- The population in Lexington is higher at 320,347, compared to 1,068 in Strum.
- The median age in Lexington is higher at 35.2 years, compared to 33.7 years in Strum.
- Lexington has a higher median income of $66,087, compared to $64,911 in Strum.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Strum at 41.0% compared to 36.0% in Lexington.
- The poverty level is higher in Lexington at 11%, compared to 0% in Strum.
- Lexington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.5% in Strum.
Demographics
Demographics Strum vs Lexington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Strum | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 15 |
White | 91 | 68 |
Asian | 1 | 4 |
Hispanic | 4 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Strum vs Lexington
- In Lexington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 0% in Strum.
- Strum has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 68% in Lexington.
- In Lexington, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Strum.
- Lexington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 4% in Strum.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lexington at 6%, compared to 3% in Strum.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Strum at 1% compared to 0% in Lexington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Strum | Lexington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 17.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 12.0% |
Depression | 23.2% | 24.0% |
Smoking | 15.7% | 17.0% |
Binge Drinking | 24.8% | 15.9% |
Obesity | 35.0% | 36.0% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Strum vs Lexington
- In Lexington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 14.7% in Strum.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lexington at 24.0% versus 23.2% in Strum.
- Lexington has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 15.7% in Strum.
- Binge drinking is more common in Strum at 24.8% compared to 15.9% in Lexington.
- Lexington has higher obesity rates at 36.0% compared to 35.0% in Strum.
- Disability percentages are higher in Strum at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Lexington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Strum | Lexington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (7) | 0.6% (2,032) |
High School Diploma | 23.6% (252) | 9.9% (31,844) |
Less than High School | 4.5% (48) | 8.7% (27,787) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.5% (155) | 30.4% (97,540) |
Education Levels Comparison: Strum vs Lexington
- A higher percentage of residents in Strum have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Lexington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Strum hold a high school diploma at 23.6% compared to 9.9% in Lexington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lexington at 8.7%, compared to 4.5% in Strum.
- In Lexington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 14.5% in Strum.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.