Demographics details for Stow, OH vs Kingsburg, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stow, OH vs Kingsburg, CA.
| Data | Stow | Kingsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,216 | 12,613 |
| Median Age | 39.7 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $89,805 | $74,897 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Stow vs Kingsburg
- In Stow, the population is higher at 34,216, compared to 12,613 in Kingsburg.
- Residents in Stow have a higher median age of 39.7 years compared to 37.6 years in Kingsburg.
- Stow has a higher median income of $89,805 compared to $74,897 in Kingsburg.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Stow at 46.0% compared to 36.0% in Kingsburg.
- The poverty level is higher in Kingsburg at 12%, compared to 8% in Stow.
- The unemployment rate in Stow is higher at 4.9%, compared to 4.2% in Kingsburg.
Demographics
Demographics Stow vs Kingsburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stow | Kingsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 89 | 32 |
| Asian | 3 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Stow vs Kingsburg
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Stow at 3% compared to 1% in Kingsburg.
- Stow has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 32% in Kingsburg.
- In Kingsburg, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 3% in Stow.
- Kingsburg has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 1% in Stow.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kingsburg at 14%, compared to 4% in Stow.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stow and Kingsburg at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stow | Kingsburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 16.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 17.9% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 12.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 38.3% | 34.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stow vs Kingsburg
- In Kingsburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.1% compared to 15.4% in Stow.
- Depression is more prevalent in Stow at 23.6% compared to 17.9% in Kingsburg.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Stow at 14.8% compared to 12.1% in Kingsburg.
- Binge drinking is more common in Stow at 19.5% compared to 15.9% in Kingsburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Stow at 38.3% compared to 34.5% in Kingsburg.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Stow and Kingsburg at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stow | Kingsburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (208) | 1.1% (144) |
| High School Diploma | 14.9% (5,110) | 17.2% (2,168) |
| Less than High School | 3.7% (1,256) | 17.8% (2,242) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.7% (11,546) | 13.8% (1,739) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stow vs Kingsburg
- In Kingsburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.6% in Stow.
- In Kingsburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.2% compared to 14.9% in Stow.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kingsburg at 17.8%, compared to 3.7% in Stow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stow hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.7% compared to 13.8% in Kingsburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.