Demographics details for Stow, OH vs Central falls, RI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stow, OH vs Central falls, RI.
| Data | Stow | Central falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,216 | 22,490 |
| Median Age | 39.7 years | 31.5 years |
| Median Income | $89,805 | $43,092 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Stow vs Central falls
- In Stow, the population is higher at 34,216, compared to 22,490 in Central falls.
- Residents in Stow have a higher median age of 39.7 years compared to 31.5 years in Central falls.
- Stow has a higher median income of $89,805 compared to $43,092 in Central falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Stow at 46.0% compared to 29.0% in Central falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Central falls at 20%, compared to 8% in Stow.
- Central falls has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 4.9% in Stow.
Demographics
Demographics Stow vs Central falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stow | Central falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 8 |
| White | 89 | 4 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 69 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Stow vs Central falls
- In Central falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 3% in Stow.
- Stow has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 4% in Central falls.
- The Asian population is larger in Stow at 3% compared to 0% in Central falls.
- Central falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 69%, compared to 1% in Stow.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central falls at 18%, compared to 4% in Stow.
- In Central falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Stow.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stow | Central falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 17.4% |
| Depression | 23.6% | 26.7% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | 22.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | 14.2% |
| Obesity | 38.3% | 40.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stow vs Central falls
- In Central falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 15.4% in Stow.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Central falls at 26.7% versus 23.6% in Stow.
- Central falls has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 14.8% in Stow.
- Binge drinking is more common in Stow at 19.5% compared to 14.2% in Central falls.
- Central falls has higher obesity rates at 40.6% compared to 38.3% in Stow.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central falls at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Stow.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stow | Central falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (208) | 4.7% (1,048) |
| High School Diploma | 14.9% (5,110) | 15.1% (3,406) |
| Less than High School | 3.7% (1,256) | 44.1% (9,911) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.7% (11,546) | 5.6% (1,270) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stow vs Central falls
- In Central falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.7% compared to 0.6% in Stow.
- In Central falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.1% compared to 14.9% in Stow.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central falls at 44.1%, compared to 3.7% in Stow.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stow hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.7% compared to 5.6% in Central falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.