Demographics details for Stow, OH vs Beaverdam, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stow, OH vs Beaverdam, VA.
| Data | Stow | Beaverdam |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 34,216 | 14,809 |
| Median Age | 39.7 years | 45.4 years |
| Median Income | $89,805 | $110,208 |
| Married Families | 46.0% | 53.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Stow vs Beaverdam
- In Stow, the population is higher at 34,216, compared to 14,809 in Beaverdam.
- The median age in Beaverdam is higher at 45.4 years, compared to 39.7 years in Stow.
- Beaverdam has a higher median income of $110,208, compared to $89,805 in Stow.
- In Beaverdam, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 46.0% in Stow.
- Stow has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Beaverdam.
- The unemployment rate in Stow is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.0% in Beaverdam.
Demographics
Demographics Stow vs Beaverdam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stow | Beaverdam |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 9 |
| White | 89 | 78 |
| Asian | 3 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Stow vs Beaverdam
- In Beaverdam, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 3% in Stow.
- Stow has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 78% in Beaverdam.
- The Asian population is larger in Stow at 3% compared to 1% in Beaverdam.
- Beaverdam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 1% in Stow.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Beaverdam at 6%, compared to 4% in Stow.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stow and Beaverdam at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stow | Beaverdam |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.4% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 23.6% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 14.8% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.5% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 38.3% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stow vs Beaverdam
- More residents in Stow report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
- Depression is more prevalent in Stow at 23.6% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Stow at 14.8% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
- Binge drinking is more common in Stow at 19.5% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
- Obesity rates are higher in Stow at 38.3% compared to 0.0% in Beaverdam.
- Disability percentages are higher in Stow at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Beaverdam.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stow | Beaverdam |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (208) | 1.0% (151) |
| High School Diploma | 14.9% (5,110) | 16.6% (2,455) |
| Less than High School | 3.7% (1,256) | 7.5% (1,117) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.7% (11,546) | 33.8% (5,006) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stow vs Beaverdam
- In Beaverdam, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in Stow.
- In Beaverdam, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.6% compared to 14.9% in Stow.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beaverdam at 7.5%, compared to 3.7% in Stow.
- In Beaverdam, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.8% compared to 33.7% in Stow.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.