Demographics details for Stoughton, WI vs Seaside park, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stoughton, WI vs Seaside park, NJ.
| Data | Stoughton | Seaside park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,846 | 1,473 |
| Median Age | 41.6 years | 59.5 years |
| Median Income | $73,014 | $80,658 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 57.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Stoughton vs Seaside park
- In Stoughton, the population is higher at 12,846, compared to 1,473 in Seaside park.
- The median age in Seaside park is higher at 59.5 years, compared to 41.6 years in Stoughton.
- Seaside park has a higher median income of $80,658, compared to $73,014 in Stoughton.
- In Seaside park, the percentage of married families is higher at 57.0%, compared to 40.0% in Stoughton.
- Stoughton has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Seaside park.
- Seaside park has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Stoughton.
Demographics
Demographics Stoughton vs Seaside park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stoughton | Seaside park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 93 | 90 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Stoughton vs Seaside park
- In Seaside park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Stoughton.
- Stoughton has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 90% in Seaside park.
- In Seaside park, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Stoughton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Stoughton at 3% compared to 1% in Seaside park.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Stoughton at 3% compared to 2% in Seaside park.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stoughton and Seaside park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stoughton | Seaside park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.4% | 15.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.7% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 24.8% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 13.8% | 13.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 24.5% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 28.8% | 30.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stoughton vs Seaside park
- In Seaside park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.4% compared to 14.4% in Stoughton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Stoughton at 24.8% compared to 23.1% in Seaside park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Stoughton at 13.8% compared to 13.2% in Seaside park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Stoughton at 24.5% compared to 18.2% in Seaside park.
- Seaside park has higher obesity rates at 30.7% compared to 28.8% in Stoughton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Stoughton at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Seaside park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stoughton | Seaside park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (51) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.4% (1,850) | 22.2% (327) |
| Less than High School | 7.6% (981) | 3.3% (49) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.2% (3,241) | 56.3% (830) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stoughton vs Seaside park
- A higher percentage of residents in Stoughton have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Seaside park.
- In Seaside park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.2% compared to 14.4% in Stoughton.
- More residents in Stoughton have less than a high school education at 7.6% compared to 3.3% in Seaside park.
- In Seaside park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 56.3% compared to 25.2% in Stoughton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.