Demographics details for Stoughton, WI vs Holly springs, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Stoughton, WI vs Holly springs, MS.

Data Stoughton Holly springs
Population 12,846 6,823
Median Age 41.6 years 40.6 years
Median Income $73,014 $45,552
Married Families 40.0% 23.0%
Poverty Level 9% 20%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 6.1

Population Comparison: Stoughton vs Holly springs

  • In Stoughton, the population is higher at 12,846, compared to 6,823 in Holly springs.
  • Residents in Stoughton have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 40.6 years in Holly springs.
  • Stoughton has a higher median income of $73,014 compared to $45,552 in Holly springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Stoughton at 40.0% compared to 23.0% in Holly springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Holly springs at 20%, compared to 9% in Stoughton.
  • Holly springs has a higher unemployment rate at 6.1% compared to 3.5% in Stoughton.

Demographics

Demographics Stoughton vs Holly springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Stoughton Holly springs
Black 1 79
White 93 17
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 Data is updating
Two or More Races 3 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Stoughton vs Holly springs

  • In Holly springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 79% compared to 1% in Stoughton.
  • Stoughton has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 17% in Holly springs.
  • Both Stoughton and Holly springs have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Stoughton at 3% compared to 0% in Holly springs.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Holly springs at 4%, compared to 3% in Stoughton.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stoughton and Holly springs at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Stoughton Holly springs
Mental Health Not Good 14.4% 17.9%
Physical Health Not Good 8.7% 14.8%
Depression 24.8% 19.8%
Smoking 13.8% 24.1%
Binge Drinking 24.5% 11.9%
Obesity 28.8% 48.3%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Stoughton vs Holly springs

  • In Holly springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 14.4% in Stoughton.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Stoughton at 24.8% compared to 19.8% in Holly springs.
  • Holly springs has a higher smoking rate at 24.1% compared to 13.8% in Stoughton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Stoughton at 24.5% compared to 11.9% in Holly springs.
  • Holly springs has higher obesity rates at 48.3% compared to 28.8% in Stoughton.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Stoughton at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Holly springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Stoughton Holly springs
No Schooling 0.4% (51) 0.7% (50)
High School Diploma 14.4% (1,850) 22.1% (1,509)
Less than High School 7.6% (981) 14.8% (1,007)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 25.2% (3,241) 8.9% (605)

Education Levels Comparison: Stoughton vs Holly springs

  • In Holly springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.4% in Stoughton.
  • In Holly springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.1% compared to 14.4% in Stoughton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Holly springs at 14.8%, compared to 7.6% in Stoughton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Stoughton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.2% compared to 8.9% in Holly springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.