Demographics details for Stoughton, MA vs Heppner, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stoughton, MA vs Heppner, OR.
Data | Stoughton | Heppner |
---|---|---|
Population | 28,950 | 1,172 |
Median Age | 40.0 years | 39.1 years |
Median Income | $86,000 | $46,708 |
Married Families | 54.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Stoughton vs Heppner
- In Stoughton, the population is higher at 28,950, compared to 1,172 in Heppner.
- Residents in Stoughton have a higher median age of 40.0 years compared to 39.1 years in Heppner.
- Stoughton has a higher median income of $86,000 compared to $46,708 in Heppner.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Stoughton at 54.0% compared to 43.0% in Heppner.
- The poverty level is higher in Heppner at 10%, compared to 5% in Stoughton.
- Heppner has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 3.7% in Stoughton.
Demographics
Demographics Stoughton vs Heppner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Stoughton | Heppner |
---|---|---|
Black | 7 | 1 |
White | 72 | 86 |
Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 12 | 6 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Stoughton vs Heppner
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Stoughton at 7% compared to 1% in Heppner.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Heppner at 86% compared to 72% in Stoughton.
- The Asian population is larger in Stoughton at 5% compared to 0% in Heppner.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Stoughton at 12% compared to 6% in Heppner.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Heppner at 7%, compared to 4% in Stoughton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stoughton and Heppner at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Stoughton | Heppner |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 18.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 11.2% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 27.6% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 16.2% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 18.2% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 34.4% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 35.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stoughton vs Heppner
- In Heppner, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Heppner at 27.6% versus 0.0% in Stoughton.
- Heppner has a higher smoking rate at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Heppner at 18.2% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- Heppner has higher obesity rates at 34.4% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Heppner at 35.0% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Stoughton | Heppner |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 22.0% (258) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 9.4% (110) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 9.8% (115) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stoughton vs Heppner
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Stoughton and Heppner at 0.0%.
- In Heppner, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.0% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Heppner at 9.4%, compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
- In Heppner, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.8% compared to 0.0% in Stoughton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.