Demographics details for Stonington, CT vs Mentor, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Stonington, CT vs Mentor, MN.

Data Stonington Mentor
Population 18,545 105
Median Age 42.0 years 52.5 years
Median Income $92,222 $39,583
Married Families 60.0% 54.0%
Poverty Level 5% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 2.2 2.5

Population Comparison: Stonington vs Mentor

  • In Stonington, the population is higher at 18,545, compared to 105 in Mentor.
  • The median age in Mentor is higher at 52.5 years, compared to 42.0 years in Stonington.
  • Stonington has a higher median income of $92,222 compared to $39,583 in Mentor.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Stonington at 60.0% compared to 54.0% in Mentor.
  • Stonington has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Mentor.
  • Mentor has a higher unemployment rate at 2.5% compared to 2.2% in Stonington.

Demographics

Demographics Stonington vs Mentor provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Stonington Mentor
Black 2 Data is updating
White 90 100
Asian 2 Data is updating
Hispanic 4 Data is updating
Two or More Races 2 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Stonington vs Mentor

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Stonington at 2% compared to 0% in Mentor.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Mentor at 100% compared to 90% in Stonington.
  • The Asian population is larger in Stonington at 2% compared to 0% in Mentor.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Stonington at 4% compared to 0% in Mentor.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Stonington at 2% compared to 0% in Mentor.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stonington and Mentor at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Stonington Mentor
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.5%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 9.9%
Depression Data is updating% 24.4%
Smoking Data is updating% 19.6%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 21.8%
Obesity Data is updating% 39.7%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 19.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Stonington vs Mentor

  • In Mentor, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mentor at 24.4% versus 0.0% in Stonington.
  • Mentor has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Mentor at 21.8% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
  • Mentor has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mentor at 19.0% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Stonington Mentor
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 43.8% (46)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 30.5% (32)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 6.7% (7)

Education Levels Comparison: Stonington vs Mentor

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Stonington and Mentor at 0.0%.
  • In Mentor, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 43.8% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mentor at 30.5%, compared to 0.0% in Stonington.
  • In Mentor, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 6.7% compared to 0.0% in Stonington.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.