Demographics details for Stoddard, WI vs Wright, WY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stoddard, WI vs Wright, WY.
Data | Stoddard | Wright |
---|---|---|
Population | 860 | 1,640 |
Median Age | 42.1 years | 35.8 years |
Median Income | $62,125 | $88,150 |
Married Families | 34.0% | 55.0% |
Poverty Level | 7% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Stoddard vs Wright
- The population in Wright is higher at 1,640, compared to 860 in Stoddard.
- Residents in Stoddard have a higher median age of 42.1 years compared to 35.8 years in Wright.
- Wright has a higher median income of $88,150, compared to $62,125 in Stoddard.
- In Wright, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 34.0% in Stoddard.
- Stoddard has a higher poverty level at 7% compared to 5% in Wright.
- The unemployment rate in Stoddard is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.5% in Wright.
Demographics
Demographics Stoddard vs Wright provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Stoddard | Wright |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 1 |
White | 95 | 74 |
Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
Hispanic | 2 | 11 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 13 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Stoddard vs Wright
- In Wright, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Stoddard.
- Stoddard has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 74% in Wright.
- In Wright, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Stoddard.
- Wright has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 2% in Stoddard.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Wright at 13%, compared to 3% in Stoddard.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stoddard and Wright at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Stoddard | Wright |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.1% | 14.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.7% | 9.7% |
Depression | 23.6% | 18.3% |
Smoking | 15.8% | 16.8% |
Binge Drinking | 24.6% | 19.0% |
Obesity | 37.6% | 34.3% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stoddard vs Wright
- More residents in Stoddard report poor mental health at 15.1% compared to 14.3% in Wright.
- Depression is more prevalent in Stoddard at 23.6% compared to 18.3% in Wright.
- Wright has a higher smoking rate at 16.8% compared to 15.8% in Stoddard.
- Binge drinking is more common in Stoddard at 24.6% compared to 19.0% in Wright.
- Obesity rates are higher in Stoddard at 37.6% compared to 34.3% in Wright.
- Disability percentages are higher in Stoddard at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Wright.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Stoddard | Wright |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 9.8% (160) |
High School Diploma | 21.7% (187) | 20.5% (336) |
Less than High School | 6.5% (56) | 20.7% (340) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.5% (99) | 7.0% (114) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stoddard vs Wright
- In Wright, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 9.8% compared to 0.0% in Stoddard.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stoddard hold a high school diploma at 21.7% compared to 20.5% in Wright.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wright at 20.7%, compared to 6.5% in Stoddard.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stoddard hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.5% compared to 7.0% in Wright.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.