Demographics details for Stockton, IA vs Kings mountain, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Stockton, IA vs Kings mountain, NC.

Data Stockton Kings mountain
Population 173 11,638
Median Age 43.5 years 41.5 years
Median Income $46,908 $45,301
Married Families 23.0% 24.0%
Poverty Level 8% 11%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Stockton vs Kings mountain

  • The population in Kings mountain is higher at 11,638, compared to 173 in Stockton.
  • Residents in Stockton have a higher median age of 43.5 years compared to 41.5 years in Kings mountain.
  • Stockton has a higher median income of $46,908 compared to $45,301 in Kings mountain.
  • In Kings mountain, the percentage of married families is higher at 24.0%, compared to 23.0% in Stockton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Kings mountain at 11%, compared to 8% in Stockton.
  • Kings mountain has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Stockton.

Demographics

Demographics Stockton vs Kings mountain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Stockton Kings mountain
Black Data is updating 25
White 93 68
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 3 2
Two or More Races 2 3
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Stockton vs Kings mountain

  • In Kings mountain, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 0% in Stockton.
  • Stockton has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 68% in Kings mountain.
  • In Kings mountain, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Stockton.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Stockton at 3% compared to 2% in Kings mountain.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kings mountain at 3%, compared to 2% in Stockton.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Stockton at 1% compared to 0% in Kings mountain.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Stockton Kings mountain
Mental Health Not Good 15.7% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 9.3% 13.1%
Depression 20.7% 25.7%
Smoking 16.6% 20.9%
Binge Drinking 21.1% 16.3%
Obesity 37.1% 38.0%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Stockton vs Kings mountain

  • In Kings mountain, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.7% in Stockton.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Kings mountain at 25.7% versus 20.7% in Stockton.
  • Kings mountain has a higher smoking rate at 20.9% compared to 16.6% in Stockton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Stockton at 21.1% compared to 16.3% in Kings mountain.
  • Kings mountain has higher obesity rates at 38.0% compared to 37.1% in Stockton.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kings mountain at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Stockton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Stockton Kings mountain
No Schooling 0.6% (1) 0.4% (43)
High School Diploma 21.4% (37) 21.7% (2,528)
Less than High School 13.9% (24) 17.8% (2,071)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 5.8% (10) 11.6% (1,353)

Education Levels Comparison: Stockton vs Kings mountain

  • A higher percentage of residents in Stockton have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Kings mountain.
  • In Kings mountain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 21.4% in Stockton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kings mountain at 17.8%, compared to 13.9% in Stockton.
  • In Kings mountain, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.6% compared to 5.8% in Stockton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.