Demographics details for Stockton, IA vs Kings mountain, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stockton, IA vs Kings mountain, NC.
Data | Stockton | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Population | 173 | 11,638 |
Median Age | 43.5 years | 41.5 years |
Median Income | $46,908 | $45,301 |
Married Families | 23.0% | 24.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Stockton vs Kings mountain
- The population in Kings mountain is higher at 11,638, compared to 173 in Stockton.
- Residents in Stockton have a higher median age of 43.5 years compared to 41.5 years in Kings mountain.
- Stockton has a higher median income of $46,908 compared to $45,301 in Kings mountain.
- In Kings mountain, the percentage of married families is higher at 24.0%, compared to 23.0% in Stockton.
- The poverty level is higher in Kings mountain at 11%, compared to 8% in Stockton.
- Kings mountain has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Stockton.
Demographics
Demographics Stockton vs Kings mountain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Stockton | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 25 |
White | 93 | 68 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 3 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 3 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Stockton vs Kings mountain
- In Kings mountain, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 0% in Stockton.
- Stockton has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 68% in Kings mountain.
- In Kings mountain, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Stockton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Stockton at 3% compared to 2% in Kings mountain.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kings mountain at 3%, compared to 2% in Stockton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Stockton at 1% compared to 0% in Kings mountain.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Stockton | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.3% | 13.1% |
Depression | 20.7% | 25.7% |
Smoking | 16.6% | 20.9% |
Binge Drinking | 21.1% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 37.1% | 38.0% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stockton vs Kings mountain
- In Kings mountain, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.7% in Stockton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kings mountain at 25.7% versus 20.7% in Stockton.
- Kings mountain has a higher smoking rate at 20.9% compared to 16.6% in Stockton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Stockton at 21.1% compared to 16.3% in Kings mountain.
- Kings mountain has higher obesity rates at 38.0% compared to 37.1% in Stockton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kings mountain at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Stockton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Stockton | Kings mountain |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (1) | 0.4% (43) |
High School Diploma | 21.4% (37) | 21.7% (2,528) |
Less than High School | 13.9% (24) | 17.8% (2,071) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 5.8% (10) | 11.6% (1,353) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stockton vs Kings mountain
- A higher percentage of residents in Stockton have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Kings mountain.
- In Kings mountain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 21.4% in Stockton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kings mountain at 17.8%, compared to 13.9% in Stockton.
- In Kings mountain, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.6% compared to 5.8% in Stockton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.