Demographics details for Stockton, IA vs Cedar lake, IN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Stockton, IA vs Cedar lake, IN.

Data Stockton Cedar lake
Population 173 15,592
Median Age 43.5 years 39.5 years
Median Income $46,908 $84,444
Married Families 23.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 8% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Stockton vs Cedar lake

  • The population in Cedar lake is higher at 15,592, compared to 173 in Stockton.
  • Residents in Stockton have a higher median age of 43.5 years compared to 39.5 years in Cedar lake.
  • Cedar lake has a higher median income of $84,444, compared to $46,908 in Stockton.
  • In Cedar lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 23.0% in Stockton.
  • Stockton has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 5% in Cedar lake.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Stockton and Cedar lake at 3.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Stockton vs Cedar lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Stockton Cedar lake
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 93 94
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 3 3
Two or More Races 2 3
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Stockton vs Cedar lake

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Stockton and Cedar lake at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar lake at 94% compared to 93% in Stockton.
  • The Asian population is larger in Stockton at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Stockton and Cedar lake at 3%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar lake at 3%, compared to 2% in Stockton.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Stockton at 1% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Stockton Cedar lake
Mental Health Not Good 15.7% 16.6%
Physical Health Not Good 9.3% 11.1%
Depression 20.7% 25.4%
Smoking 16.6% 18.8%
Binge Drinking 21.1% 19.8%
Obesity 37.1% 37.2%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Stockton vs Cedar lake

  • In Cedar lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.7% in Stockton.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar lake at 25.4% versus 20.7% in Stockton.
  • Cedar lake has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 16.6% in Stockton.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Stockton at 21.1% compared to 19.8% in Cedar lake.
  • Cedar lake has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 37.1% in Stockton.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Stockton and Cedar lake at 10.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Stockton Cedar lake
No Schooling 0.6% (1) 0.4% (67)
High School Diploma 21.4% (37) 21.1% (3,292)
Less than High School 13.9% (24) 7.1% (1,102)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 5.8% (10) 14.1% (2,204)

Education Levels Comparison: Stockton vs Cedar lake

  • A higher percentage of residents in Stockton have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Cedar lake.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Stockton hold a high school diploma at 21.4% compared to 21.1% in Cedar lake.
  • More residents in Stockton have less than a high school education at 13.9% compared to 7.1% in Cedar lake.
  • In Cedar lake, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 5.8% in Stockton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.