Demographics details for Stockton, GA vs Hanover park, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Stockton, GA vs Hanover park, IL.

Data Stockton Hanover park
Population 556 36,376
Median Age 39.0 years 34.7 years
Median Income $57,000 $88,460
Married Families 60.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 12% 6%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 5.6

Population Comparison: Stockton vs Hanover park

  • The population in Hanover park is higher at 36,376, compared to 556 in Stockton.
  • Residents in Stockton have a higher median age of 39.0 years compared to 34.7 years in Hanover park.
  • Hanover park has a higher median income of $88,460, compared to $57,000 in Stockton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Stockton at 60.0% compared to 39.0% in Hanover park.
  • Stockton has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Hanover park.
  • Hanover park has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 4.0% in Stockton.

Demographics

Demographics Stockton vs Hanover park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Stockton Hanover park
Black 10 8
White 90 17
Asian Data is updating 20
Hispanic Data is updating 39
Two or More Races Data is updating 15
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Stockton vs Hanover park

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Stockton at 10% compared to 8% in Hanover park.
  • Stockton has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 17% in Hanover park.
  • In Hanover park, the Asian population stands at 20%, greater than 0% in Stockton.
  • Hanover park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 39%, compared to 0% in Stockton.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hanover park at 15%, compared to 0% in Stockton.
  • In Hanover park, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Stockton.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Stockton Hanover park
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 13.2%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 9.9%
Depression Data is updating% 16.1%
Smoking Data is updating% 13.1%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 16.4%
Obesity Data is updating% 30.5%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Stockton vs Hanover park

  • In Hanover park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.2% compared to 0.0% in Stockton.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Hanover park at 16.1% versus 0.0% in Stockton.
  • Hanover park has a higher smoking rate at 13.1% compared to 0.0% in Stockton.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Hanover park at 16.4% compared to 0.0% in Stockton.
  • Hanover park has higher obesity rates at 30.5% compared to 0.0% in Stockton.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hanover park at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Stockton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Stockton Hanover park
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 2.1% (758)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 16.2% (5,894)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 21.1% (7,688)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 18.0% (6,537)

Education Levels Comparison: Stockton vs Hanover park

  • In Hanover park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Stockton.
  • In Hanover park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Stockton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hanover park at 21.1%, compared to 0.0% in Stockton.
  • In Hanover park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.0% compared to 0.0% in Stockton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.