Demographics details for Stockton, CA vs South windsor, CT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Stockton, CA vs South windsor, CT.

Data Stockton South windsor
Population 321,819 26,054
Median Age 33.2 years 42.0 years
Median Income $71,612 $90,964
Married Families 31.0% 62.0%
Poverty Level 18% 5%
Unemployment Rate 7.0 2.2

Population Comparison: Stockton vs South windsor

  • In Stockton, the population is higher at 321,819, compared to 26,054 in South windsor.
  • The median age in South windsor is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 33.2 years in Stockton.
  • South windsor has a higher median income of $90,964, compared to $71,612 in Stockton.
  • In South windsor, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 31.0% in Stockton.
  • Stockton has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 5% in South windsor.
  • The unemployment rate in Stockton is higher at 7.0%, compared to 2.2% in South windsor.

Demographics

Demographics Stockton vs South windsor provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Stockton South windsor
Black 12 9
White 2 85
Asian 21 3
Hispanic 45 3
Two or More Races 19 2
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Stockton vs South windsor

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Stockton at 12% compared to 9% in South windsor.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in South windsor at 85% compared to 2% in Stockton.
  • The Asian population is larger in Stockton at 21% compared to 3% in South windsor.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Stockton at 45% compared to 3% in South windsor.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Stockton at 19% compared to 2% in South windsor.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Stockton at 1% compared to 0% in South windsor.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Stockton South windsor
Mental Health Not Good 16.7% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 12.9% Data is updating%
Depression 16.5% Data is updating%
Smoking 15.0% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 14.0% Data is updating%
Obesity 34.4% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 13.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Stockton vs South windsor

  • More residents in Stockton report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Stockton at 16.5% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Stockton at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Stockton at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Stockton at 34.4% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Stockton at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Stockton South windsor
No Schooling 3.6% (11,670) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 15.9% (51,278) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 23.3% (74,948) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.3% (36,260) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Stockton vs South windsor

  • A higher percentage of residents in Stockton have no formal schooling at 3.6% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Stockton hold a high school diploma at 15.9% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • More residents in Stockton have less than a high school education at 23.3% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Stockton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.3% compared to 0.0% in South windsor.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.