Demographics details for Stockholm, WI vs Ashland, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stockholm, WI vs Ashland, OH.
| Data | Stockholm | Ashland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 82 | 19,015 |
| Median Age | 69.8 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $62,500 | $56,040 |
| Married Families | 84.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Stockholm vs Ashland
- The population in Ashland is higher at 19,015, compared to 82 in Stockholm.
- Residents in Stockholm have a higher median age of 69.8 years compared to 38.8 years in Ashland.
- Stockholm has a higher median income of $62,500 compared to $56,040 in Ashland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Stockholm at 84.0% compared to 38.0% in Ashland.
- The poverty level is higher in Ashland at 11%, compared to 0% in Stockholm.
- Ashland has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.5% in Stockholm.
Demographics
Demographics Stockholm vs Ashland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stockholm | Ashland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 100 | 91 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Stockholm vs Ashland
- In Ashland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
- Stockholm has a higher percentage of White residents at 100% compared to 91% in Ashland.
- In Ashland, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Stockholm.
- Ashland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Stockholm.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ashland at 4%, compared to 0% in Stockholm.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Stockholm and Ashland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stockholm | Ashland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 11.8% | 18.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 20.6% | 24.6% |
| Smoking | 16.4% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.3% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 38.6% | 38.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stockholm vs Ashland
- In Ashland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 11.8% in Stockholm.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ashland at 24.6% versus 20.6% in Stockholm.
- Ashland has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 16.4% in Stockholm.
- Binge drinking is more common in Stockholm at 19.3% compared to 18.1% in Ashland.
- Ashland has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 38.6% in Stockholm.
- Disability percentages are higher in Stockholm at 26.0% compared to 16.0% in Ashland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stockholm | Ashland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.1% (28) |
| High School Diploma | 28.0% (23) | 23.0% (4,380) |
| Less than High School | 2.4% (2) | 12.3% (2,337) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 64.6% (53) | 16.6% (3,160) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stockholm vs Ashland
- In Ashland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Stockholm.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stockholm hold a high school diploma at 28.0% compared to 23.0% in Ashland.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Ashland at 12.3%, compared to 2.4% in Stockholm.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stockholm hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 64.6% compared to 16.6% in Ashland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.