Demographics details for Stockbridge, GA vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stockbridge, GA vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Stockbridge | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,064 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 37.0 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $72,175 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.6 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Stockbridge vs Coalinga
- In Stockbridge, the population is higher at 29,064, compared to 17,024 in Coalinga.
- Residents in Stockbridge have a higher median age of 37.0 years compared to 35.0 years in Coalinga.
- Stockbridge has a higher median income of $72,175 compared to $68,976 in Coalinga.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Stockbridge and Coalinga at 31.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Coalinga at 15%, compared to 12% in Stockbridge.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.6% in Stockbridge.
Demographics
Demographics Stockbridge vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stockbridge | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 66 | 4 |
| White | 15 | 9 |
| Asian | 7 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Stockbridge vs Coalinga
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Stockbridge at 66% compared to 4% in Coalinga.
- Stockbridge has a higher percentage of White residents at 15% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- The Asian population is larger in Stockbridge at 7% compared to 2% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 7% in Stockbridge.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 5% in Stockbridge.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Stockbridge.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stockbridge | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.7% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 18.7% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 15.0% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 37.8% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stockbridge vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 15.7% in Stockbridge.
- Depression is more prevalent in Stockbridge at 18.7% compared to 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher smoking rate at 17.2% compared to 15.0% in Stockbridge.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Coalinga at 15.9% compared to 14.6% in Stockbridge.
- Coalinga has higher obesity rates at 39.1% compared to 37.8% in Stockbridge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Coalinga at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Stockbridge.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stockbridge | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (497) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 14.2% (4,124) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 8.4% (2,436) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.3% (5,603) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stockbridge vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 1.7% in Stockbridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stockbridge hold a high school diploma at 14.2% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 8.4% in Stockbridge.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stockbridge hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.3% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.