Demographics details for Stillwater, OK vs Tahoka, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stillwater, OK vs Tahoka, TX.
| Data | Stillwater | Tahoka |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 49,160 | 2,413 |
| Median Age | 23.4 years | 37.7 years |
| Median Income | $39,998 | $41,282 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Stillwater vs Tahoka
- In Stillwater, the population is higher at 49,160, compared to 2,413 in Tahoka.
- The median age in Tahoka is higher at 37.7 years, compared to 23.4 years in Stillwater.
- Tahoka has a higher median income of $41,282, compared to $39,998 in Stillwater.
- In Tahoka, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 25.0% in Stillwater.
- Stillwater has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 15% in Tahoka.
- Tahoka has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 4.0% in Stillwater.
Demographics
Demographics Stillwater vs Tahoka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stillwater | Tahoka |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | 72 | 28 |
| Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 48 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 22 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Stillwater vs Tahoka
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Stillwater at 5% compared to 2% in Tahoka.
- Stillwater has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 28% in Tahoka.
- The Asian population is larger in Stillwater at 6% compared to 0% in Tahoka.
- Tahoka has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 48%, compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tahoka at 22%, compared to 9% in Stillwater.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Stillwater at 3% compared to 0% in Tahoka.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stillwater | Tahoka |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 16.3% |
| Depression | 26.1% | 24.5% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 22.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 42.0% | 43.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stillwater vs Tahoka
- In Tahoka, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 19.1% in Stillwater.
- Depression is more prevalent in Stillwater at 26.1% compared to 24.5% in Tahoka.
- Tahoka has a higher smoking rate at 22.8% compared to 19.5% in Stillwater.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tahoka at 15.6% compared to 13.6% in Stillwater.
- Tahoka has higher obesity rates at 43.8% compared to 42.0% in Stillwater.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tahoka at 22.0% compared to 11.0% in Stillwater.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stillwater | Tahoka |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (239) | 1.5% (36) |
| High School Diploma | 6.5% (3,199) | 17.1% (412) |
| Less than High School | 3.9% (1,910) | 28.3% (684) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.5% (11,068) | 13.9% (335) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stillwater vs Tahoka
- In Tahoka, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.5% in Stillwater.
- In Tahoka, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.1% compared to 6.5% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tahoka at 28.3%, compared to 3.9% in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stillwater hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 13.9% in Tahoka.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.