Demographics details for Stillwater, OK vs Rialto, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Stillwater, OK vs Rialto, CA.
| Data | Stillwater | Rialto |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 49,160 | 103,545 |
| Median Age | 23.4 years | 31.2 years |
| Median Income | $39,998 | $80,750 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Stillwater vs Rialto
- The population in Rialto is higher at 103,545, compared to 49,160 in Stillwater.
- The median age in Rialto is higher at 31.2 years, compared to 23.4 years in Stillwater.
- Rialto has a higher median income of $80,750, compared to $39,998 in Stillwater.
- In Rialto, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 25.0% in Stillwater.
- The poverty level is higher in Rialto at 18%, compared to 16% in Stillwater.
- Rialto has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.0% in Stillwater.
Demographics
Demographics Stillwater vs Rialto provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Stillwater | Rialto |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 12 |
| White | 72 | -7 |
| Asian | 6 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 75 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 17 |
| American Indian | 3 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Stillwater vs Rialto
- In Rialto, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- Stillwater has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to -7% in Rialto.
- The Asian population is larger in Stillwater at 6% compared to 2% in Rialto.
- Rialto has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 75%, compared to 5% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rialto at 17%, compared to 9% in Stillwater.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Stillwater at 3% compared to 1% in Rialto.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Stillwater | Rialto |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 13.7% |
| Depression | 26.1% | 17.5% |
| Smoking | 19.5% | 13.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.6% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 42.0% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Stillwater vs Rialto
- More residents in Stillwater report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.1% in Rialto.
- Depression is more prevalent in Stillwater at 26.1% compared to 17.5% in Rialto.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Stillwater at 19.5% compared to 13.8% in Rialto.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rialto at 14.8% compared to 13.6% in Stillwater.
- Obesity rates are higher in Stillwater at 42.0% compared to 41.1% in Rialto.
- Disability percentages are higher in Stillwater at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Rialto.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Stillwater | Rialto |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (239) | 2.7% (2,754) |
| High School Diploma | 6.5% (3,199) | 18.6% (19,301) |
| Less than High School | 3.9% (1,910) | 30.0% (31,028) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.5% (11,068) | 7.5% (7,751) |
Education Levels Comparison: Stillwater vs Rialto
- In Rialto, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.5% in Stillwater.
- In Rialto, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.6% compared to 6.5% in Stillwater.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rialto at 30.0%, compared to 3.9% in Stillwater.
- A higher percentage of residents in Stillwater hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.5% compared to 7.5% in Rialto.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.